Head to head
Las Vegas Sands vs Wynn Resorts
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: LVS · WYNN
LVS
Las Vegas Sands
35.81-1.38%
1-year price shape — -29% over the period
Quant Rating E · 11/100
vs
WYNN
Wynn Resorts
74.97-2.15%
1-year price shape — -38% over the period
Quant Rating E · 7/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Las Vegas Sands edges it on the scoreable measures. Las Vegas Sands has the highest Quant Rating (11); Las Vegas Sands has done best over the past year (-29%); Las Vegas Sands trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| LVS | WYNN | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Resorts & Casinos | -- |
| Last price | 35.81 | 74.97 |
| Change today | -1.38% | -2.15% |
| 1-year return | -29.4% | -38.4% |
| Market cap | $23.19B | $7.72B |
| 52-week range | 35.70 – 69.24 | 74.70 – 133.75 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 13.88 | 17.98 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 20th | 64th |
| P/B | 39.92 | -45.55 |
| Dividend yield | 3.07% | 1.33% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 2.35 | 3.14 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $1.52B | $323.34M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.72B | $7.41B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -0.7% | +6.9% |
| Gross margin | 48.5% | 40.7% |
| Operating margin | 23.4% | 17.0% |
| Net margin | 12.6% | 6.1% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $2.70B | $791.87M |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 72.5% | 85.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 26 buy / 24 sell | 15 buy / 34 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 2.8% | 8.7% |
| Analyst consensus | 56% buy / 44% hold (16) | 100% buy (14) |
| Analyst price target | $59 (+66%) | $132 (+76%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | E (11) | E (7) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 41,500 | 28,500 |
| Founded | 2004 | 2002 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.