Head to head
Mako Mining vs Newmont
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: MAKO · NEM
MAKO
Mako Mining
8.93+1.25%
1-year price shape — +47% over the period
Quant Rating B · 70/100
vs
NEM
Newmont
114.52+0.86%
1-year price shape — +32% over the period
Quant Rating B · 71/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Newmont edges it on the scoreable measures. Newmont has the highest Quant Rating (71); Newmont trades cheapest on trailing earnings; Newmont pays the highest dividend yield.
| MAKO | NEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Gold | Gold |
| Last price | 8.93 | 114.52 |
| Change today | +1.25% | +0.86% |
| 1-year return | +47.2% | +31.8% |
| Market cap | $782.32M | $120.67B |
| 52-week range | 4.96 – 11.10 | 75.34 – 135.01 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 15.14 | 14.44 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 78th | 57th |
| P/B | 4.11 | 3.42 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.89% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.41 | 6.39 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $35.92M | $6.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $209.16M | $25.77B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +61.7% | +15.1% |
| Gross margin | 53.3% | 59.1% |
| Operating margin | 40.7% | 55.2% |
| Net margin | 25.1% | 33.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $56.14M | $9.73B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 52.6% | 81.7% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 0 sell | 19 buy / 28 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 0.0% | 1.6% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (1) | 92% buy / 8% hold (12) |
| Analyst price target | $14 (+53%) | $139 (+22%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (70) | B (71) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 514 | 44,100 |
| Founded | 2004 | 1921 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.