Head to head
Mettler-Toledo International vs Thermo Fisher Scientific
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: MTD · TMO
MTD
Mettler-Toledo International
1,533.48+0.03%
1-year price shape — +17% over the period
Quant Rating C · 56/100
vs
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific
662.06+0.83%
1-year price shape — +23% over the period
Quant Rating C · 64/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Thermo Fisher Scientific edges it on the scoreable measures. Thermo Fisher Scientific has the highest Quant Rating (64); Thermo Fisher Scientific has done best over the past year (+23%); Thermo Fisher Scientific pays the highest dividend yield.
| MTD | TMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Diagnostics & Research | Diagnostics & Research |
| Last price | 1,533.48 | 662.06 |
| Change today | +0.03% | +0.83% |
| 1-year return | +17.1% | +23.1% |
| Market cap | $30.73B | $244.79B |
| 52-week range | 1,023.05 – 1,585.72 | 434.50 – 694.33 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 34.57 | 35.63 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 48th | 86th |
| P/B | 2,396.06 | 4.65 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.27% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 42.05 | 17.74 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $842.54M | $6.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.13B | $46.34B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.5% | +10.5% |
| Gross margin | 60.3% | 40.8% |
| Operating margin | 28.4% | 18.3% |
| Net margin | 21.9% | 15.0% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $863.97M | $7.32B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 104.5% | 93.1% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 36 buy / 12 sell | 22 buy / 28 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 3.5% | 1.4% |
| Analyst consensus | 60% buy / 30% hold / 10% sell (10) | 88% buy / 12% hold (17) |
| Analyst price target | $1,481 (-3%) | $653 (-1%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | C (56) | C (64) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 18,100 | 125,000 |
| Founded | 1991 | 1956 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.