Head to head
NEBIUS vs Alphabet-A
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: NBIS · GOOGL
NBIS
NEBIUS
237.15-5.09%
1-year price shape — +101% over the period
Quant Rating B · 92/100
vs
GOOGL
Alphabet-A
350.50+0.81%
1-year price shape — +43% over the period
Quant Rating B · 78/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Alphabet-A edges it on the scoreable measures. Alphabet-A trades cheapest on trailing earnings; Alphabet-A pays the highest dividend yield; Alphabet-A earns the most per share.
| NBIS | GOOGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Last price | 237.15 | 350.50 |
| Change today | -5.09% | +0.81% |
| 1-year return | +101.5% | +43.0% |
| Market cap | $64.47B | $4.29T |
| 52-week range | 73.52 – 299.86 | 239.09 – 408.10 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 329.38 | 17.59 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 94th | 4th |
| P/B | 6.24 | 6.89 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.24% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.33 | 10.81 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $89.71M | $132.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.36B | $445.87B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +454.0% | +24.2% |
| Gross margin | 74.3% | 60.9% |
| Operating margin | -50.5% | 33.1% |
| Net margin | 3.1% | 54.8% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-5.88B | $53.27B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 63.9% | 67.3% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 8 buy / 36 sell | 24 buy / 26 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 17.2% | 0.7% |
| Analyst consensus | 80% buy / 10% hold / 10% sell (10) | 85% buy / 15% hold (27) |
| Analyst price target | $326 (+37%) | $427 (+22%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (92) | B (78) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 1,543 | 182,502 |
| Founded | 2004 | 2015 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.