Head to head
NANO Nuclear Energy vs GE Vernova
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: NNE · GEV
NNE
NANO Nuclear Energy
16.01-2.91%
1-year price shape — -72% over the period
Quant Rating F · 35/100
vs
GEV
GE Vernova
997.09-3.12%
1-year price shape — +65% over the period
Quant Rating B · 88/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
GE Vernova edges it on the scoreable measures. GE Vernova has the highest Quant Rating (88); GE Vernova has done best over the past year (+65%); GE Vernova pays the highest dividend yield.
| NNE | GEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Specialty Industrial Machinery | Specialty Industrial Machinery |
| Last price | 16.01 | 997.09 |
| Change today | -2.91% | -3.12% |
| 1-year return | -71.7% | +64.9% |
| Market cap | $859.71M | $265.56B |
| 52-week range | 14.71 – 60.87 | 529.18 – 1,195.94 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -23.20 | 28.59 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 87th | 20th |
| P/B | 1.40 | 22.21 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.20% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -1.06 | 17.69 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-56.92M | $4.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $214.04K | $41.37B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -- | +21.9% |
| Gross margin | -- | 20.2% |
| Operating margin | -24456.1% | 4.4% |
| Net margin | -15815.1% | 23.0% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-38.05M | $12.44B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 57.5% | 81.0% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 17 buy / 31 sell | 35 buy / 15 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 28.8% | 3.3% |
| Analyst consensus | 75% buy / 25% hold (8) | 89% buy / 6% hold / 6% sell (18) |
| Analyst price target | $39 (+145%) | $1,251 (+25%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | F (35) | B (88) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 62 | 78,000 |
| Founded | 2022 | 2021 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.