Head to head
Nutrien vs CF Industries Holdings
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: NTR · CF
NTR
Nutrien
69.97-1.73%
1-year price shape — +19% over the period
Quant Rating C · 61/100
vs
CF
CF Industries Holdings
114.44-1.36%
1-year price shape — +27% over the period
Quant Rating C · 68/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
CF Industries Holdings edges it on the scoreable measures. CF Industries Holdings has the highest Quant Rating (68); CF Industries Holdings has done best over the past year (+27%); CF Industries Holdings trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| NTR | CF | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Agricultural Inputs |
| Last price | 69.97 | 114.44 |
| Change today | -1.73% | -1.36% |
| 1-year return | +19.2% | +27.0% |
| Market cap | $33.39B | $17.32B |
| 52-week range | 50.05 – 81.99 | 74.33 – 141.66 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 14.16 | 8.49 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 41st | 29th |
| P/B | 1.29 | 3.01 |
| Dividend yield | 3.13% | 1.75% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 4.66 | 8.97 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $2.22B | $1.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28.21B | $7.74B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +3.6% | +17.6% |
| Gross margin | 31.0% | 42.5% |
| Operating margin | 14.7% | 39.1% |
| Net margin | 8.4% | 27.1% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $2.09B | $1.90B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 73.0% | 107.6% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 1 buy / 2 sell | 15 buy / 35 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 1.6% | 6.5% |
| Analyst consensus | 69% buy / 23% hold / 8% sell (13) | 36% buy / 45% hold / 18% sell (11) |
| Analyst price target | $78 (+11%) | $128 (+12%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | C (61) | C (68) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 25,100 | 2,900 |
| Founded | 2017 | 1946 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.