Head to head
New York Times vs Pearson
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: NYT · PSO
NYT
New York Times
64.90+1.66%
1-year price shape — +19% over the period
Quant Rating D · 60/100
vs
PSO
Pearson
16.42+0.61%
1-year price shape — +20% over the period
Quant Rating C · 60/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Pearson edges it on the scoreable measures. Pearson has done best over the past year (+20%); Pearson trades cheapest on trailing earnings; Pearson pays the highest dividend yield.
| NYT | PSO | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Publishing | -- |
| Last price | 64.90 | 16.42 |
| Change today | +1.66% | +0.61% |
| 1-year return | +19.3% | +19.8% |
| Market cap | $10.47B | $9.87B |
| 52-week range | 53.45 – 86.52 | 11.72 – 17.62 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 27.04 | 24.84 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 5th | 73rd |
| P/B | 5.11 | 2.23 |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | 2.08% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 2.09 | 0.67 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $337.08M | $402.72M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.98B | $4.82B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +11.2% | +10.3% |
| Gross margin | 51.4% | 52.0% |
| Operating margin | 16.6% | 16.9% |
| Net margin | 13.2% | 8.8% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $623.02M | -- |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 105.4% | 93.1% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 37 buy / 13 sell | 0 buy / 2 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 8.4% | 0.6% |
| Analyst consensus | 71% buy / 29% hold (7) | 100% hold (1) |
| Analyst price target | $81 (+25%) | $17 (+6%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (60) | C (60) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 6,000 | 17,062 |
| Founded | 1851 | 1844 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.