Head to head
Central North Airport vs Pacific Airport
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: OMAB · PAC
OMAB
Central North Airport
91.69-3.12%
1-year price shape — -5% over the period
Quant Rating D · 33/100
vs
PAC
Pacific Airport
201.41-3.72%
1-year price shape — -12% over the period
Quant Rating D · 26/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Central North Airport edges it on the scoreable measures. Central North Airport has the highest Quant Rating (33); Central North Airport has done best over the past year (-5%); Central North Airport trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| OMAB | PAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Airports & Air Services |
| Last price | 91.69 | 201.41 |
| Change today | -3.12% | -3.72% |
| 1-year return | -5.1% | -12.2% |
| Market cap | $4.43B | $11.98B |
| 52-week range | 90.86 – 131.22 | 193.11 – 300.41 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 14.68 | 19.64 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 27th | 46th |
| P/B | 8.74 | 4.09 |
| Dividend yield | 5.97% | 2.40% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 6.15 | 10.52 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $296.96M | $626.14M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.33B | $42.13B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.6% | +3.7% |
| Gross margin | 69.2% | 56.8% |
| Operating margin | 55.1% | 43.3% |
| Net margin | 33.2% | 24.3% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $6.78B | $4.63B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 71.1% | 45.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 0 sell | 3 buy / 2 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 0.7% | 0.7% |
| Analyst consensus | 50% buy / 50% hold (2) | 67% buy / 33% hold (3) |
| Analyst price target | $118 (+28%) | $275 (+37%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (33) | D (26) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 1,355 | 3,341 |
| Founded | 1998 | 1998 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.