Head to head
Osisko Gold Royalties vs Newmont
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: OR · NEM
OR
Osisko Gold Royalties
33.92-1.60%
1-year price shape — -16% over the period
Quant Rating D · 22/100
vs
NEM
Newmont
113.54-2.45%
1-year price shape — +32% over the period
Quant Rating B · 71/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Newmont edges it on the scoreable measures. Newmont has the highest Quant Rating (71); Newmont has done best over the past year (+32%); Newmont trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| OR | NEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Gold | Gold |
| Last price | 33.92 | 113.54 |
| Change today | -1.60% | -2.45% |
| 1-year return | -16.5% | +31.8% |
| Market cap | $6.35B | $119.64B |
| 52-week range | 27.49 – 47.80 | 75.34 – 135.01 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 22.61 | 14.32 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 57th | 57th |
| P/B | 4.28 | 3.39 |
| Dividend yield | 0.68% | 0.90% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 1.09 | 6.39 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $204.16M | $6.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $362.74M | $25.77B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +62.1% | +15.1% |
| Gross margin | 84.9% | 59.1% |
| Operating margin | 76.8% | 55.2% |
| Net margin | 78.0% | 33.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-91.93M | $9.73B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 82.5% | 81.7% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 0 sell | 19 buy / 28 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Analyst consensus | 50% buy / 50% hold (4) | 92% buy / 8% hold (12) |
| Analyst price target | $48 (+43%) | $139 (+23%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (22) | B (71) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 27 | 44,100 |
| Founded | 2014 | 1921 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.