Head to head
Ouster vs Amphenol
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: OUST · APH
OUST
Ouster
41.67-7.21%
1-year price shape — +27% over the period
Quant Rating C · 70/100
vs
APH
Amphenol
87.55-1.21%
1-year price shape — +41% over the period
Quant Rating B · 79/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Amphenol edges it on the scoreable measures. Amphenol has the highest Quant Rating (79); Amphenol has done best over the past year (+41%); Amphenol pays the highest dividend yield.
| OUST | APH | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Electronic Components | Electronic Components |
| Last price | 41.67 | 87.55 |
| Change today | -7.21% | -1.21% |
| 1-year return | +27.5% | +41.4% |
| Market cap | $3.00B | $215.90B |
| 52-week range | 16.40 – 63.79 | 58.82 – 89.93 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -50.20 | 43.78 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 1st | 84th |
| P/B | 8.09 | 13.94 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.52% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -1.07 | 1.67 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-77.16M | $4.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $204.91M | $29.01B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +55.9% | +55.0% |
| Gross margin | 49.6% | 38.5% |
| Operating margin | -30.6% | 27.7% |
| Net margin | -26.0% | 17.7% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-82.47M | $4.71B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 50.7% | 97.1% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 9 buy / 41 sell | 24 buy / 25 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 9.4% | 1.3% |
| Analyst consensus | 80% buy / 20% hold (5) | 91% buy / 9% hold (11) |
| Analyst price target | $61 (+47%) | $101 (+15%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | C (70) | B (79) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 320 | 170,000 |
| Founded | 2015 | 1932 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.