Head to head
Pampa Energia vs 3M
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: PAM · MMM
PAM
Pampa Energia
80.12-1.67%
1-year price shape — +34% over the period
Quant Rating D · 73/100
vs
MMM
3M
162.12-0.93%
1-year price shape — +6% over the period
Quant Rating C · 46/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Pampa Energia edges it on the scoreable measures. Pampa Energia has the highest Quant Rating (73); Pampa Energia has done best over the past year (+34%); Pampa Energia trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| PAM | MMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Conglomerates | Conglomerates |
| Last price | 80.12 | 162.12 |
| Change today | -1.67% | -0.93% |
| 1-year return | +33.6% | +6.3% |
| Market cap | $4.29B | $83.61B |
| 52-week range | 58.50 – 94.50 | 138.02 – 184.09 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 7.28 | 28.80 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 52nd | 88th |
| P/B | 1.07 | 28.32 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.86% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 7.00 | 6.00 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $375.23M | $3.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.42B | $25.18B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +53.5% | +2.5% |
| Gross margin | 33.6% | 39.4% |
| Operating margin | 20.4% | 20.4% |
| Net margin | 23.6% | 11.9% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-455.00M | $3.99B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 38.6% | 76.3% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 16 buy / 15 sell | 29 buy / 20 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 0.7% | 1.9% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% hold (1) | 42% buy / 50% hold / 8% sell (12) |
| Analyst price target | $105 (+31%) | $189 (+17%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (73) | C (46) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 1,847 | 60,500 |
| Founded | 1945 | 1902 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.