Head to head
Peapack Gladstone Financial vs Mizuho Financial
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: PGC · MFG
PGC
Peapack Gladstone Financial
43.44+0.07%
1-year price shape — +57% over the period
Quant Rating C · 63/100
vs
MFG
Mizuho Financial
10.63-1.35%
1-year price shape — +72% over the period
Quant Rating B · 88/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Mizuho Financial edges it on the scoreable measures. Mizuho Financial has the highest Quant Rating (88); Mizuho Financial has done best over the past year (+72%); Mizuho Financial pays the highest dividend yield.
| PGC | MFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | -- |
| Last price | 43.44 | 10.63 |
| Change today | +0.07% | -1.35% |
| 1-year return | +56.8% | +71.6% |
| Market cap | $770.10M | $129.28B |
| 52-week range | 24.57 – 49.09 | 6.06 – 11.49 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 15.08 | 16.71 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 65th | 93rd |
| P/B | 1.12 | 1.81 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 1.64% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 2.10 | 0.64 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $37.23M | $7.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $310.22M | $4.54T |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +24.3% | +35.7% |
| Gross margin | -- | -- |
| Operating margin | -- | -- |
| Net margin | 16.7% | 30.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $102.01M | $737.37B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 79.2% | 46.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 35 buy / 15 sell | 47 buy / 3 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 5.4% | 0.1% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (2) | 100% buy (1) |
| Analyst price target | $57 (+31%) | -- |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | C (63) | B (88) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 682 | 52,427 |
| Founded | 1997 | 1864 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.