Head to head
Primerica vs Manulife Financial
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: PRI · MFC
PRI
Primerica
273.41-2.05%
1-year price shape — +2% over the period
Quant Rating D · 39/100
vs
MFC
Manulife Financial
41.67-2.94%
1-year price shape — +34% over the period
Quant Rating B · 74/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Manulife Financial edges it on the scoreable measures. Manulife Financial has the highest Quant Rating (74); Manulife Financial has done best over the past year (+34%); Manulife Financial pays the highest dividend yield.
| PRI | MFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Insurance - Life | -- |
| Last price | 273.41 | 41.67 |
| Change today | -2.05% | -2.94% |
| 1-year return | +1.9% | +34.4% |
| Market cap | $8.41B | $68.93B |
| 52-week range | 227.14 – 325.96 | 30.29 – 44.96 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 10.99 | 16.10 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 4th | 90th |
| P/B | 3.34 | 2.11 |
| Dividend yield | 1.64% | 3.13% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 22.91 | 2.15 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $705.11M | $3.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.43B | $57.48B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +9.0% | +27.8% |
| Gross margin | -- | -- |
| Operating margin | -- | -- |
| Net margin | 23.2% | 10.8% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $842.16M | $30.95B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 96.3% | 57.4% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 34 buy / 16 sell | 10 buy / 0 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 3.9% | 0.5% |
| Analyst consensus | 20% buy / 80% hold (5) | 83% buy / 17% hold (6) |
| Analyst price target | $333 (+22%) | $50 (+19%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (39) | B (74) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 2,530 | 27,000 |
| Founded | 1977 | 1887 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.