Head to head
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality vs Booking Holdings
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: PRSU · BKNG
PRSU
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality
52.50-0.44%
1-year price shape — +52% over the period
Quant Rating B · 80/100
vs
BKNG
Booking Holdings
155.87-1.12%
1-year price shape — -25% over the period
Quant Rating E · 13/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Booking Holdings edges it on the scoreable measures. Booking Holdings trades cheapest on trailing earnings; Booking Holdings pays the highest dividend yield; Booking Holdings earns the most per share.
| PRSU | BKNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| Last price | 52.50 | 155.87 |
| Change today | -0.44% | -1.12% |
| 1-year return | +52.3% | -25.0% |
| Market cap | $1.43B | $117.12B |
| 52-week range | 32.03 – 56.52 | 149.40 – 219.22 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 38.89 | 17.31 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 67th | 0th |
| P/B | 2.67 | -10.86 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.80 | 6.62 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $21.81M | $4.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $483.23M | $28.24B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +14.3% | +8.1% |
| Gross margin | 92.5% | 98.0% |
| Operating margin | 16.1% | 34.5% |
| Net margin | 7.9% | 25.5% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-5.44M | $9.54B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 137.9% | 98.8% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 27 buy / 16 sell | 18 buy / 32 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 5.2% | 2.6% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (7) | 79% buy / 21% hold (28) |
| Analyst price target | $62 (+18%) | $236 (+51%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (80) | E (13) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 2,100 | 24,300 |
| Founded | 1926 | 1997 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.