Head to head
Pearson vs New York Times
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: PSO · NYT
PSO
Pearson
16.42+0.61%
1-year price shape — +20% over the period
Quant Rating C · 60/100
vs
NYT
New York Times
64.90+1.66%
1-year price shape — +19% over the period
Quant Rating D · 60/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Pearson edges it on the scoreable measures. Pearson has done best over the past year (+20%); Pearson trades cheapest on trailing earnings; Pearson pays the highest dividend yield.
| PSO | NYT | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Publishing |
| Last price | 16.42 | 64.90 |
| Change today | +0.61% | +1.66% |
| 1-year return | +19.8% | +19.3% |
| Market cap | $9.87B | $10.47B |
| 52-week range | 11.72 – 17.62 | 53.45 – 86.52 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 24.84 | 27.04 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 73rd | 5th |
| P/B | 2.23 | 5.11 |
| Dividend yield | 2.08% | 1.19% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.67 | 2.09 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $402.72M | $337.08M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.82B | $2.98B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +10.3% | +11.2% |
| Gross margin | 52.0% | 51.4% |
| Operating margin | 16.9% | 16.6% |
| Net margin | 8.8% | 13.2% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | -- | $623.02M |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 93.1% | 105.4% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 2 sell | 37 buy / 13 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 0.6% | 8.4% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% hold (1) | 71% buy / 29% hold (7) |
| Analyst price target | $17 (+6%) | $81 (+25%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | C (60) | D (60) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 17,062 | 6,000 |
| Founded | 1844 | 1851 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.