Head to head
RIVER CITY BANK vs Mizuho Financial
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: RCBC · MFG
RCBC
RIVER CITY BANK
54.65-0.09%
1-year price shape — +43% over the period
Quant Rating D · 54/100
vs
MFG
Mizuho Financial
10.77-3.41%
1-year price shape — +72% over the period
Quant Rating B · 88/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Mizuho Financial edges it on the scoreable measures. Mizuho Financial has the highest Quant Rating (88); Mizuho Financial has done best over the past year (+72%); Mizuho Financial pays the highest dividend yield.
| RCBC | MFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Banks - Regional | -- |
| Last price | 54.65 | 10.77 |
| Change today | -0.09% | -3.41% |
| 1-year return | +42.6% | +71.6% |
| Market cap | $764.82M | $131.05B |
| 52-week range | 38.03 – 55.77 | 6.06 – 11.49 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 11.65 | 16.93 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 100th | 93rd |
| P/B | 1.35 | 1.83 |
| Dividend yield | 0.29% | 1.62% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 4.69 | 0.64 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $65.64M | $7.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.17M | $4.54T |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -75.9% | +35.7% |
| Gross margin | -- | -- |
| Operating margin | -- | -- |
| Net margin | 130.5% | 30.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | -- | $737.37B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 18.8% | 46.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 0 sell | 47 buy / 3 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 0.6% | 0.1% |
| Analyst consensus | 50% buy / 50% hold (4) | 100% buy (1) |
| Analyst price target | $56 (+2%) | -- |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (54) | B (88) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 160 | 52,427 |
| Founded | 1973 | 1864 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.