Head to head
RH vs Williams-Sonoma
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: RH · WSM
RH
RH
115.19-1.68%
1-year price shape — -41% over the period
Quant Rating E · 5/100
vs
WSM
Williams-Sonoma
240.46-0.74%
1-year price shape — +29% over the period
Quant Rating C · 66/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Williams-Sonoma edges it on the scoreable measures. Williams-Sonoma has the highest Quant Rating (66); Williams-Sonoma has done best over the past year (+29%); Williams-Sonoma pays the highest dividend yield.
| RH | WSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Specialty Retail | -- |
| Last price | 115.19 | 240.46 |
| Change today | -1.68% | -0.74% |
| 1-year return | -41.4% | +29.0% |
| Market cap | $2.18B | $28.32B |
| 52-week range | 106.30 – 239.40 | 164.96 – 254.89 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 20.35 | 24.66 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 34th | 91st |
| P/B | 18.12 | 13.23 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.18% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 6.31 | 8.84 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $119.47M | $1.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.45B | $8.01B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.6% | +6.7% |
| Gross margin | 44.3% | 47.2% |
| Operating margin | 10.0% | 19.2% |
| Net margin | 3.2% | 14.7% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $250.43M | $1.34B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 107.6% | 98.5% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 32 buy / 18 sell | 28 buy / 20 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 26.4% | 4.9% |
| Analyst consensus | 38% buy / 54% hold / 8% sell (13) | 60% buy / 40% hold (15) |
| Analyst price target | $171 (+48%) | $258 (+7%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | E (5) | C (66) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 7,230 | 19,800 |
| Founded | 1980 | 1956 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.