Head to head
ResMed vs Intuitive Surgical
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: RMD · ISRG
RMD
ResMed
225.98+2.40%
1-year price shape — -19% over the period
Quant Rating D · 19/100
vs
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical
414.52+2.41%
1-year price shape — -6% over the period
Quant Rating D · 30/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Intuitive Surgical edges it on the scoreable measures. Intuitive Surgical has the highest Quant Rating (30); Intuitive Surgical has done best over the past year (-6%).
| RMD | ISRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Medical Instruments & Supplies | Medical Instruments & Supplies |
| Last price | 225.98 | 414.52 |
| Change today | +2.40% | +2.41% |
| 1-year return | -19.4% | -6.0% |
| Market cap | $31.78B | $146.44B |
| 52-week range | 179.75 – 275.42 | 328.57 – 603.88 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 21.67 | 47.54 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 6th | 6th |
| P/B | 4.83 | 8.06 |
| Dividend yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 10.43 | 7.87 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $1.47B | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.65B | $11.03B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.6% | +18.5% |
| Gross margin | 61.1% | 66.7% |
| Operating margin | 33.8% | 31.3% |
| Net margin | 26.9% | 28.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $1.63B | $3.22B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 79.3% | 88.8% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 21 buy / 29 sell | 21 buy / 29 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 9.8% | 2.3% |
| Analyst consensus | 38% buy / 62% hold (13) | 86% buy / 14% hold (21) |
| Analyst price target | $246 (+9%) | $490 (+18%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (19) | D (30) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 11,370 | 17,021 |
| Founded | 1989 | 1995 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.