Head to head
ReNew Energy Global vs Enlight Renewable Energy
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: RNW · ENLT
RNW
ReNew Energy Global
6.89+0.29%
1-year price shape — -15% over the period
Quant Rating D · 23/100
vs
ENLT
Enlight Renewable Energy
66.08-2.22%
1-year price shape — +109% over the period
Quant Rating D · 94/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Enlight Renewable Energy edges it on the scoreable measures. Enlight Renewable Energy has the highest Quant Rating (94); Enlight Renewable Energy has done best over the past year (+109%); Enlight Renewable Energy earns the most per share.
| RNW | ENLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Utilities - Renewable |
| Last price | 6.89 | 66.08 |
| Change today | +0.29% | -2.22% |
| 1-year return | -14.9% | +108.8% |
| Market cap | $2.51B | $9.24B |
| 52-week range | 4.39 – 7.86 | 32.75 – 108.65 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 22.44 | 55.53 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 58th | 69th |
| P/B | 1.86 | 4.27 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.28 | 1.00 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $102.44M | $139.90M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $137.78B | $678.87M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +14.3% | +43.0% |
| Gross margin | 81.7% | 74.9% |
| Operating margin | 45.2% | 43.0% |
| Net margin | 7.9% | 13.2% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-17.48B | $-1.50B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 100.5% | 52.1% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 11 buy / 6 sell | 0 buy / 28 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 0.7% | 0.7% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% hold (2) | 60% buy / 40% sell (5) |
| Analyst price target | $7 (+2%) | $90 (+36%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (23) | D (94) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 4,720 | 406 |
| Founded | 2011 | 1981 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.