Head to head
Rogers vs Amphenol
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: ROG · APH
ROG
Rogers
153.96-1.69%
1-year price shape — +87% over the period
Quant Rating B · 91/100
vs
APH
Amphenol
87.55-1.21%
1-year price shape — +41% over the period
Quant Rating B · 79/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Amphenol edges it on the scoreable measures. Amphenol trades cheapest on trailing earnings; Amphenol pays the highest dividend yield; Amphenol earns the most per share.
| ROG | APH | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Electronic Components | Electronic Components |
| Last price | 153.96 | 87.55 |
| Change today | -1.69% | -1.21% |
| 1-year return | +86.9% | +41.4% |
| Market cap | $2.75B | $215.90B |
| 52-week range | 75.14 – 169.00 | 58.82 – 89.93 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 91.10 | 43.78 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 100th | 84th |
| P/B | 2.28 | 13.94 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.52% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -3.40 | 1.67 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-60.75M | $4.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $834.80M | $29.01B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +6.9% | +55.0% |
| Gross margin | 32.4% | 38.5% |
| Operating margin | 9.0% | 27.7% |
| Net margin | 3.7% | 17.7% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $82.80M | $4.71B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 101.8% | 97.1% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 16 buy / 32 sell | 24 buy / 25 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 3.5% | 1.3% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (2) | 91% buy / 9% hold (11) |
| Analyst price target | $205 (+33%) | $101 (+15%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (91) | B (79) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 3,000 | 170,000 |
| Founded | 1832 | 1932 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.