Head to head
Rush Street Interactive vs Flutter Entertainment
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: RSI · FLUT
RSI
Rush Street Interactive
20.24-1.56%
1-year price shape — +13% over the period
Quant Rating D · 49/100
vs
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment
75.85-0.52%
1-year price shape — -68% over the period
Quant Rating E · 1/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Rush Street Interactive edges it on the scoreable measures. Rush Street Interactive has the highest Quant Rating (49); Rush Street Interactive has done best over the past year (+13%); Rush Street Interactive earns the most per share.
| RSI | FLUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Gambling | Gambling |
| Last price | 20.24 | 75.85 |
| Change today | -1.56% | -0.52% |
| 1-year return | +12.6% | -68.1% |
| Market cap | $2.34B | $13.16B |
| 52-week range | 15.51 – 34.53 | 73.50 – 255.26 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 61.33 | -17.81 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 69th | 86th |
| P/B | 12.64 | 1.50 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.31 | -1.75 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $35.84M | $-303.69M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $17.16B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +46.3% | +3.3% |
| Gross margin | 35.0% | 42.5% |
| Operating margin | 10.0% | -0.7% |
| Net margin | 2.3% | -4.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $145.42M | $505.00M |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 112.5% | 93.6% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 4 buy / 46 sell | 33 buy / 17 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 8.0% | 8.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (9) | 74% buy / 26% hold (19) |
| Analyst price target | $36 (+78%) | $131 (+72%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (49) | E (1) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 912 | 28,518 |
| Founded | 2012 | 1988 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.