Head to head
Sally Beauty Holdings vs Williams-Sonoma
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: SBH · WSM
SBH
Sally Beauty Holdings
16.50+1.48%
1-year price shape — +4% over the period
Quant Rating C · 39/100
vs
WSM
Williams-Sonoma
240.46-0.74%
1-year price shape — +29% over the period
Quant Rating C · 66/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Williams-Sonoma edges it on the scoreable measures. Williams-Sonoma has the highest Quant Rating (66); Williams-Sonoma has done best over the past year (+29%); Williams-Sonoma pays the highest dividend yield.
| SBH | WSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | -- |
| Last price | 16.50 | 240.46 |
| Change today | +1.48% | -0.74% |
| 1-year return | +3.8% | +29.0% |
| Market cap | $1.54B | $28.32B |
| 52-week range | 11.54 – 17.92 | 164.96 – 254.89 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 8.59 | 24.66 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 75th | 91st |
| P/B | 1.77 | 13.23 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.18% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 1.89 | 8.84 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $176.95M | $1.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.73B | $8.01B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +0.2% | +6.7% |
| Gross margin | 52.1% | 47.2% |
| Operating margin | 8.4% | 19.2% |
| Net margin | 5.2% | 14.7% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $241.21M | $1.34B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 127.5% | 98.5% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 40 buy / 10 sell | 28 buy / 20 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 21.3% | 4.9% |
| Analyst consensus | 67% buy / 33% sell (3) | 60% buy / 40% hold (15) |
| Analyst price target | $17 (+5%) | $258 (+7%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | C (39) | C (66) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 27,000 | 19,800 |
| Founded | 1964 | 1956 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.