Head to head
Super Group vs Flutter Entertainment
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: SGHC · FLUT
SGHC
Super Group
11.35-0.70%
1-year price shape — -14% over the period
Quant Rating D · 21/100
vs
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment
75.85-0.52%
1-year price shape — -68% over the period
Quant Rating E · 1/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Super Group edges it on the scoreable measures. Super Group has the highest Quant Rating (21); Super Group has done best over the past year (-14%); Super Group pays the highest dividend yield.
| SGHC | FLUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Gambling |
| Last price | 11.35 | 75.85 |
| Change today | -0.70% | -0.52% |
| 1-year return | -13.6% | -68.1% |
| Market cap | $5.77B | $13.16B |
| 52-week range | 8.36 – 15.80 | 73.50 – 255.26 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 15.74 | -17.81 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 16th | 86th |
| P/B | 6.93 | 1.50 |
| Dividend yield | 1.15% | 0.00% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.43 | -1.75 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $217.46M | $-303.69M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.43B | $17.16B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +18.1% | +3.3% |
| Gross margin | 53.3% | 42.5% |
| Operating margin | 21.6% | -0.7% |
| Net margin | 15.1% | -4.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $210.88M | $505.00M |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 70.7% | 93.6% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 10 buy / 19 sell | 33 buy / 17 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 5.7% | 8.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (6) | 74% buy / 26% hold (19) |
| Analyst price target | $19 (+67%) | $131 (+72%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (21) | E (1) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 2,900 | 28,518 |
| Founded | 2020 | 1988 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.