Head to head
Snap-on vs RBC Bearings
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: SNA · RBC
SNA
Snap-on
359.89-2.37%
1-year price shape — +10% over the period
Quant Rating D · 50/100
vs
RBC
RBC Bearings
500.73-2.62%
1-year price shape — +34% over the period
Quant Rating D · 74/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Snap-on edges it on the scoreable measures. Snap-on trades cheapest on trailing earnings; Snap-on pays the highest dividend yield; Snap-on earns the most per share.
| SNA | RBC | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Tools & Accessories | Tools & Accessories |
| Last price | 359.89 | 500.73 |
| Change today | -2.37% | -2.62% |
| 1-year return | +9.7% | +34.1% |
| Market cap | $18.62B | $15.85B |
| 52-week range | 312.34 – 420.41 | 364.50 – 667.69 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 18.36 | 49.48 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 84th | 39th |
| P/B | 3.08 | 4.58 |
| Dividend yield | 2.63% | 0.00% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 19.19 | 9.09 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $992.64M | $287.78M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.27B | $1.95B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.2% | +19.2% |
| Gross margin | 51.8% | 45.2% |
| Operating margin | 25.4% | 24.0% |
| Net margin | 19.6% | 16.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $1.11B | $385.20M |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 98.4% | 100.4% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 27 buy / 23 sell | 22 buy / 28 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 7.0% | 1.7% |
| Analyst consensus | 80% buy / 20% hold (5) | 100% buy (8) |
| Analyst price target | $445 (+24%) | $647 (+29%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (50) | D (74) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 13,000 | 5,816 |
| Founded | 1920 | 1919 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.