Head to head
T1 Energy vs Vertiv Holdings
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: TE · VRT
TE
T1 Energy
3.73-1.84%
1-year price shape — +30% over the period
Quant Rating D · 45/100
vs
VRT
Vertiv Holdings
246.49-2.63%
1-year price shape — +55% over the period
Quant Rating D · 83/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Vertiv Holdings edges it on the scoreable measures. Vertiv Holdings has the highest Quant Rating (83); Vertiv Holdings has done best over the past year (+55%); Vertiv Holdings pays the highest dividend yield.
| TE | VRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Last price | 3.73 | 246.49 |
| Change today | -1.84% | -2.63% |
| 1-year return | +30.4% | +55.3% |
| Market cap | $1.10B | $94.90B |
| 52-week range | 2.52 – 12.49 | 147.72 – 379.76 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -1.77 | 55.77 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 72nd | 34th |
| P/B | 5.45 | 19.95 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.09% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -2.19 | 3.41 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-644.90M | $1.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $996.85M | $11.48B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +88.4% | +24.1% |
| Gross margin | 8.3% | 38.0% |
| Operating margin | -17.0% | 19.4% |
| Net margin | -39.8% | 15.1% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-184.81M | $2.92B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 90.6% | 83.5% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 35 buy / 14 sell | 33 buy / 10 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 22.5% | 3.7% |
| Analyst consensus | 80% buy / 20% hold (5) | 100% buy (16) |
| Analyst price target | $8 (+104%) | $342 (+39%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (45) | D (83) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 562 | 34,000 |
| Founded | 2023 | 1946 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.