Head to head
Teradyne vs ASML Holding
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: TER · ASML
TER
Teradyne
411.78-4.31%
1-year price shape — +194% over the period
Quant Rating B · 98/100
vs
ASML
ASML Holding
1,804.96-1.59%
1-year price shape — +81% over the period
Quant Rating B · 90/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
ASML Holding edges it on the scoreable measures. ASML Holding pays the highest dividend yield; ASML Holding earns the most per share.
| TER | ASML | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Semiconductor Equipment & Materials | Semiconductor Equipment & Materials |
| Last price | 411.78 | 1,804.96 |
| Change today | -4.31% | -1.59% |
| 1-year return | +194.4% | +81.3% |
| Market cap | $64.38B | $693.29B |
| 52-week range | 134.74 – 487.72 | 941.58 – 1,997.38 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 56.56 | 58.54 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 86th | 99th |
| P/B | 18.73 | 28.37 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 0.48% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 3.47 | 27.66 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $542.50M | $10.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.46B | $35.33B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +103.9% | +21.3% |
| Gross margin | 59.2% | 51.6% |
| Operating margin | 30.9% | 32.7% |
| Net margin | 25.8% | 27.8% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $799.93M | $11.03B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 99.2% | 54.4% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 22 buy / 28 sell | 0 buy / 0 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 5.2% | 0.4% |
| Analyst consensus | 67% buy / 33% hold (12) | 100% buy (6) |
| Analyst price target | $474 (+15%) | $2,392 (+33%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (98) | B (90) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 6,600 | 44,000 |
| Founded | 1960 | 1984 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.