Head to head
The Timken vs Snap-on
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: TKR · SNA
TKR
The Timken
114.91-3.87%
1-year price shape — +54% over the period
Quant Rating B · 83/100
vs
SNA
Snap-on
359.89-2.37%
1-year price shape — +10% over the period
Quant Rating D · 50/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Snap-on edges it on the scoreable measures. Snap-on trades cheapest on trailing earnings; Snap-on pays the highest dividend yield; Snap-on earns the most per share.
| TKR | SNA | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Tools & Accessories |
| Last price | 114.91 | 359.89 |
| Change today | -3.87% | -2.37% |
| 1-year return | +53.6% | +9.7% |
| Market cap | $7.96B | $18.62B |
| 52-week range | 70.43 – 145.98 | 312.34 – 420.41 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 31.14 | 18.36 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 98th | 84th |
| P/B | 2.49 | 3.08 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 2.63% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 4.11 | 19.19 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $284.81M | $992.64M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.76B | $5.27B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.5% | +4.2% |
| Gross margin | 30.8% | 51.8% |
| Operating margin | 12.7% | 25.4% |
| Net margin | 5.4% | 19.6% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $385.50M | $1.11B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 95.4% | 98.4% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 31 buy / 18 sell | 27 buy / 23 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 6.2% | 7.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 86% buy / 14% hold (7) | 80% buy / 20% hold (5) |
| Analyst price target | $152 (+33%) | $445 (+24%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (83) | D (50) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 19,000 | 13,000 |
| Founded | 1899 | 1920 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.