Head to head
Energy Fuels vs Cameco
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: UUUU · CCJ
UUUU
Energy Fuels
10.26-8.88%
1-year price shape — -42% over the period
Quant Rating E · 7/100
vs
CCJ
Cameco
89.07-4.25%
1-year price shape — +3% over the period
Quant Rating D · 45/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Cameco edges it on the scoreable measures. Cameco has the highest Quant Rating (45); Cameco has done best over the past year (+3%); Cameco pays the highest dividend yield.
| UUUU | CCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Uranium | Uranium |
| Last price | 10.26 | 89.07 |
| Change today | -8.88% | -4.25% |
| 1-year return | -41.7% | +3.2% |
| Market cap | $2.72B | $38.79B |
| 52-week range | 10.23 – 27.90 | 77.54 – 135.24 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -31.09 | 156.81 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 43rd | 72nd |
| P/B | 3.43 | 7.75 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.19% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -0.38 | 0.95 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-100.61M | $412.45M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $105.76M | $3.47B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +496.1% | -7.2% |
| Gross margin | 40.9% | 26.9% |
| Operating margin | -78.6% | 14.8% |
| Net margin | -77.3% | 10.2% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-120.43M | $555.92M |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 75.5% | 65.9% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 30 buy / 20 sell | 0 buy / 33 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 21.0% | 2.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (5) | 89% buy / 11% hold (9) |
| Analyst price target | $24 (+135%) | $125 (+41%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | E (7) | D (45) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 1,069 | 3,082 |
| Founded | 1987 | 1988 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.