Head to head
Universal Corp vs Philip Morris International
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: UVV · PM
UVV
Universal Corp
42.83+0.30%
1-year price shape — -16% over the period
Quant Rating D · 50/100
vs
PM
Philip Morris International
192.69+1.20%
1-year price shape — +28% over the period
Quant Rating B · 70/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Philip Morris International edges it on the scoreable measures. Philip Morris International has the highest Quant Rating (70); Philip Morris International has done best over the past year (+28%); Philip Morris International trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| UVV | PM | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Tobacco | Tobacco |
| Last price | 42.83 | 192.69 |
| Change today | +0.30% | +1.20% |
| 1-year return | -16.4% | +28.0% |
| Market cap | $1.07B | $300.33B |
| 52-week range | 41.10 – 57.51 | 137.25 – 205.99 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 56.36 | 27.73 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 97th | 79th |
| P/B | 0.77 | -34.99 |
| Dividend yield | 7.66% | 3.05% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 1.30 | 7.26 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $32.37M | $11.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.85B | $42.55B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -11.8% | +10.4% |
| Gross margin | 16.8% | 67.5% |
| Operating margin | 6.3% | 37.7% |
| Net margin | 0.7% | 25.5% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $164.38M | $12.72B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 81.6% | 84.5% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 26 buy / 24 sell | 32 buy / 14 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 8.2% | 0.9% |
| Analyst consensus | -- | 89% buy / 11% hold (9) |
| Analyst price target | -- | $213 (+11%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (50) | B (70) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 25,000 | 84,900 |
| Founded | 1918 | 1847 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.