Head to head
Veeco Instruments vs ASML Holding
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: VECO · ASML
VECO
Veeco Instruments
53.53-3.84%
1-year price shape — +81% over the period
Quant Rating B · 90/100
vs
ASML
ASML Holding
1,804.96-1.59%
1-year price shape — +81% over the period
Quant Rating B · 90/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
ASML Holding edges it on the scoreable measures. ASML Holding has done best over the past year (+81%); ASML Holding trades cheapest on trailing earnings; ASML Holding pays the highest dividend yield.
| VECO | ASML | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Semiconductor Equipment & Materials | Semiconductor Equipment & Materials |
| Last price | 53.53 | 1,804.96 |
| Change today | -3.84% | -1.59% |
| 1-year return | +80.8% | +81.3% |
| Market cap | $3.27B | $693.29B |
| 52-week range | 26.00 – 86.63 | 941.58 – 1,997.38 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 144.68 | 58.54 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 97th | 99th |
| P/B | 3.62 | 28.37 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.48% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.59 | 27.66 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $36.07M | $10.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $655.34M | $35.33B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -5.4% | +21.3% |
| Gross margin | 38.6% | 51.6% |
| Operating margin | 4.6% | 32.7% |
| Net margin | 3.5% | 27.8% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $42.89M | $11.03B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 114.3% | 54.4% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 23 buy / 27 sell | 0 buy / 0 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 9.4% | 0.4% |
| Analyst consensus | 50% buy / 50% hold (4) | 100% buy (6) |
| Analyst price target | $61 (+15%) | $2,392 (+33%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (90) | B (90) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 1,265 | 44,000 |
| Founded | 1989 | 1984 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.