Head to head
World Kinect vs Marathon Petroleum
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: WKC · MPC
WKC
World Kinect
36.68+0.44%
1-year price shape — +47% over the period
Quant Rating B · 81/100
vs
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
442.26+2.29%
1-year price shape — +135% over the period
Quant Rating B · 96/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Marathon Petroleum edges it on the scoreable measures. Marathon Petroleum has the highest Quant Rating (96); Marathon Petroleum has done best over the past year (+135%); Marathon Petroleum earns the most per share.
| WKC | MPC | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Last price | 36.68 | 442.26 |
| Change today | +0.44% | +2.29% |
| 1-year return | +47.0% | +134.8% |
| Market cap | $1.88B | $124.20B |
| 52-week range | 21.73 – 40.93 | 160.07 – 444.99 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -11.57 | 15.33 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 1st | 75th |
| P/B | 1.49 | 6.51 |
| Dividend yield | 2.26% | 0.88% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -10.99 | 13.22 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-562.16M | $3.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41.70B | $153.58B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +50.3% | +53.8% |
| Gross margin | 2.7% | 10.3% |
| Operating margin | 0.7% | 7.5% |
| Net margin | -0.4% | 5.6% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $19.50M | $12.90B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 119.4% | 78.8% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 17 buy / 32 sell | 18 buy / 32 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 19.2% | 2.7% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% sell (1) | 71% buy / 29% hold (14) |
| Analyst price target | $30 (-18%) | $385 (-13%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (81) | B (96) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 4,003 | 18,500 |
| Founded | 1984 | 1887 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.