Head to head
John Wiley & Sons-B vs New York Times
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: WLYB · NYT
WLYB
John Wiley & Sons-B
47.90-0.21%
1-year price shape — +29% over the period
Quant Rating B · 70/100
vs
NYT
New York Times
64.90+1.66%
1-year price shape — +19% over the period
Quant Rating D · 60/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
John Wiley & Sons-B edges it on the scoreable measures. John Wiley & Sons-B has the highest Quant Rating (70); John Wiley & Sons-B has done best over the past year (+29%); John Wiley & Sons-B trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| WLYB | NYT | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Publishing | Publishing |
| Last price | 47.90 | 64.90 |
| Change today | -0.21% | +1.66% |
| 1-year return | +29.2% | +19.3% |
| Market cap | $2.43B | $10.47B |
| 52-week range | 28.49 – 55.10 | 53.45 – 86.52 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 12.91 | 27.04 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 41st | 5th |
| P/B | 3.05 | 5.11 |
| Dividend yield | 2.97% | 1.19% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 4.16 | 2.09 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $210.85M | $337.08M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.67B | $2.98B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.6% | +11.2% |
| Gross margin | 74.6% | 51.4% |
| Operating margin | 17.6% | 16.6% |
| Net margin | 11.9% | 13.2% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $207.72M | $623.02M |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 102.6% | 105.4% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 41 buy / 7 sell | 37 buy / 13 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 0.0% | 8.4% |
| Analyst consensus | -- | 71% buy / 29% hold (7) |
| Analyst price target | -- | $81 (+25%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (70) | D (60) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 4,500 | 6,000 |
| Founded | 1807 | 1851 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.