Head to head
WR Berkley vs Chubb Ltd
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: WRB · CB
WRB
WR Berkley
69.73+0.11%
1-year price shape — -8% over the period
Quant Rating D · 31/100
vs
CB
Chubb Ltd
334.70+0.15%
1-year price shape — +17% over the period
Quant Rating C · 60/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Chubb Ltd edges it on the scoreable measures. Chubb Ltd has the highest Quant Rating (60); Chubb Ltd has done best over the past year (+17%); Chubb Ltd trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| WRB | CB | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Last price | 69.73 | 334.70 |
| Change today | +0.11% | +0.15% |
| 1-year return | -7.9% | +17.1% |
| Market cap | $25.89B | $129.13B |
| 52-week range | 62.22 – 77.34 | 262.07 – 364.81 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 14.35 | 11.86 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 18th | 36th |
| P/B | 2.63 | 1.71 |
| Dividend yield | 0.53% | 1.17% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 4.45 | 25.68 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $1.65B | $9.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.92B | $62.28B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.7% | +7.2% |
| Gross margin | -- | -- |
| Operating margin | -- | -- |
| Net margin | 12.9% | 18.0% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $3.47B | $15.38B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 92.1% | 92.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 39 buy / 11 sell | 13 buy / 37 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 4.2% | 0.9% |
| Analyst consensus | 20% buy / 40% hold / 40% sell (10) | 39% buy / 50% hold / 11% sell (18) |
| Analyst price target | $73 (+4%) | $374 (+12%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (31) | C (60) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 8,804 | 45,000 |
| Founded | 1967 | 1882 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.