Head to head
Wynn Resorts vs Las Vegas Sands
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: WYNN · LVS
WYNN
Wynn Resorts
74.97-2.15%
1-year price shape — -38% over the period
Quant Rating E · 7/100
vs
LVS
Las Vegas Sands
35.81-1.38%
1-year price shape — -29% over the period
Quant Rating E · 11/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Las Vegas Sands edges it on the scoreable measures. Las Vegas Sands has the highest Quant Rating (11); Las Vegas Sands has done best over the past year (-29%); Las Vegas Sands trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| WYNN | LVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Resorts & Casinos |
| Last price | 74.97 | 35.81 |
| Change today | -2.15% | -1.38% |
| 1-year return | -38.4% | -29.4% |
| Market cap | $7.72B | $23.19B |
| 52-week range | 74.70 – 133.75 | 35.70 – 69.24 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 17.98 | 13.88 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 64th | 20th |
| P/B | -45.55 | 39.92 |
| Dividend yield | 1.33% | 3.07% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 3.14 | 2.35 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $323.34M | $1.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.41B | $13.72B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +6.9% | -0.7% |
| Gross margin | 40.7% | 48.5% |
| Operating margin | 17.0% | 23.4% |
| Net margin | 6.1% | 12.6% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $791.87M | $2.70B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 85.2% | 72.5% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 15 buy / 34 sell | 26 buy / 24 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 8.7% | 2.8% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (14) | 56% buy / 44% hold (16) |
| Analyst price target | $132 (+76%) | $59 (+66%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | E (7) | E (11) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 28,500 | 41,500 |
| Founded | 2002 | 2004 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.