Head to head
Xanadu Quantum Technologies vs Microsoft
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: XNDU · MSFT
XNDU
Xanadu Quantum Technologies
4.49-11.26%
1-year price shape — not enough history yet
Quant Rating C · 0/100
vs
MSFT
Microsoft
529.76+0.09%
1-year price shape — +2% over the period
Quant Rating C · 40/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Microsoft edges it on the scoreable measures. Microsoft has the highest Quant Rating (40); Microsoft pays the highest dividend yield; Microsoft earns the most per share.
| XNDU | MSFT | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Last price | 4.49 | 529.76 |
| Change today | -11.26% | +0.09% |
| 1-year return | -- | +1.9% |
| Market cap | $1.37B | $3.93T |
| 52-week range | 4.25 – 42.44 | 348.54 – 549.20 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -17.27 | 29.51 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 94th | 30th |
| P/B | 4.36 | 8.89 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.67% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -0.26 | 17.95 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-79.14M | $133.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.45M | $331.84B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +43.0% | +17.7% |
| Gross margin | 93.4% | 67.9% |
| Operating margin | -1268.4% | 46.8% |
| Net margin | -1458.4% | 40.3% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-60.68M | $66.99B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 62.4% | 75.3% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 0 sell | 31 buy / 16 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 2.4% | 0.9% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (4) | 100% buy (32) |
| Analyst price target | $29 (+540%) | $582 (+10%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | C (0) | C (40) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 264 | 223,000 |
| Founded | -- | 1975 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.