Head to head
Celestica vs Amphenol
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: CLS · APH
CLS
Celestica
371.57-4.29%
1-year price shape — +56% over the period
Quant Rating B · 86/100
vs
APH
Amphenol
87.55-1.21%
1-year price shape — +41% over the period
Quant Rating B · 79/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Amphenol edges it on the scoreable measures. Amphenol pays the highest dividend yield.
| CLS | APH | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Electronic Components | Electronic Components |
| Last price | 371.57 | 87.55 |
| Change today | -4.29% | -1.21% |
| 1-year return | +56.3% | +41.4% |
| Market cap | $46.32B | $215.90B |
| 52-week range | 238.23 – 474.03 | 58.82 – 89.93 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 38.62 | 43.78 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 78th | 84th |
| P/B | 18.68 | 13.94 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.52% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 7.16 | 1.67 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $892.56M | $4.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.59B | $29.01B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +62.4% | +55.0% |
| Gross margin | 12.0% | 38.5% |
| Operating margin | 8.8% | 27.7% |
| Net margin | 7.2% | 17.7% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $518.70M | $4.71B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 72.5% | 97.1% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 32 buy / 17 sell | 24 buy / 25 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 3.1% | 1.3% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (14) | 91% buy / 9% hold (11) |
| Analyst price target | $462 (+24%) | $101 (+15%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (86) | B (79) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 29,591 | 170,000 |
| Founded | 1994 | 1932 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.