Head to head
Hillman Solutions vs Snap-on
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: HLMN · SNA
HLMN
Hillman Solutions
6.94-1.42%
1-year price shape — -25% over the period
Quant Rating E · 14/100
vs
SNA
Snap-on
359.89-2.37%
1-year price shape — +10% over the period
Quant Rating D · 50/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Snap-on edges it on the scoreable measures. Snap-on has the highest Quant Rating (50); Snap-on has done best over the past year (+10%); Snap-on trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| HLMN | SNA | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Tools & Accessories | Tools & Accessories |
| Last price | 6.94 | 359.89 |
| Change today | -1.42% | -2.37% |
| 1-year return | -25.1% | +9.7% |
| Market cap | $1.35B | $18.62B |
| 52-week range | 6.66 – 10.85 | 312.34 – 420.41 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 34.70 | 18.36 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 51st | 84th |
| P/B | 1.10 | 3.08 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.63% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.20 | 19.19 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $38.91M | $992.64M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.60B | $5.27B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +9.8% | +4.2% |
| Gross margin | 48.0% | 51.8% |
| Operating margin | 6.9% | 25.4% |
| Net margin | 2.6% | 19.6% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $61.08M | $1.11B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 102.6% | 98.4% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 28 buy / 20 sell | 27 buy / 23 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 3.0% | 7.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 67% buy / 33% hold (3) | 80% buy / 20% hold (5) |
| Analyst price target | $13 (+83%) | $445 (+24%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | E (14) | D (50) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 3,986 | 13,000 |
| Founded | 1964 | 1920 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.