Head to head
International Seaways vs Enbridge
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: INSW · ENB
INSW
International Seaways
116.94+0.41%
1-year price shape — +207% over the period
Quant Rating B · 98/100
vs
ENB
Enbridge
45.89-1.40%
1-year price shape — +4% over the period
Quant Rating D · 43/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
International Seaways edges it on the scoreable measures. International Seaways has the highest Quant Rating (98); International Seaways has done best over the past year (+207%); International Seaways trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| INSW | ENB | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Last price | 116.94 | 45.89 |
| Change today | +0.41% | -1.40% |
| 1-year return | +207.4% | +4.0% |
| Market cap | $5.79B | $102.28B |
| 52-week range | 36.25 – 120.00 | 40.56 – 56.86 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 7.48 | 25.16 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 75th | 68th |
| P/B | 2.56 | 2.49 |
| Dividend yield | 3.34% | 5.87% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 6.23 | 2.27 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $308.58M | $5.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.26B | $83.49B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +138.8% | +97.1% |
| Gross margin | 59.5% | 25.7% |
| Operating margin | 55.8% | 13.6% |
| Net margin | 62.0% | 6.8% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $269.32M | $1.47B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 83.4% | 50.4% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 25 buy / 25 sell | 4 buy / 2 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 5.5% | 0.8% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (3) | 57% buy / 36% hold / 7% sell (14) |
| Analyst price target | $126 (+7%) | $55 (+21%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (98) | D (43) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 2,763 | 14,800 |
| Founded | 1999 | 1949 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.