Head to head
Procter & Gamble vs Unilever
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: PG · UL
PG
Procter & Gamble
151.23+0.42%
1-year price shape — +3% over the period
Quant Rating C · 43/100
vs
UL
Unilever
62.26+0.52%
1-year price shape — -3% over the period
Quant Rating C · 36/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Procter & Gamble edges it on the scoreable measures. Procter & Gamble has the highest Quant Rating (43); Procter & Gamble has done best over the past year (+3%); Procter & Gamble earns the most per share.
| PG | UL | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | -- |
| Last price | 151.23 | 62.26 |
| Change today | +0.42% | +0.52% |
| 1-year return | +3.4% | -2.8% |
| Market cap | $351.26B | $134.08B |
| 52-week range | 134.62 – 164.77 | 53.97 – 73.09 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 22.84 | 13.11 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 14th | 7th |
| P/B | 6.59 | 7.39 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 3.58% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 6.62 | 4.84 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $15.38B | $10.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $87.03B | $44.26B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +1.5% | +12.0% |
| Gross margin | 50.2% | 46.9% |
| Operating margin | 22.7% | 20.2% |
| Net margin | 18.1% | 18.3% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $15.15B | $3.68B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 71.4% | 71.8% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 33 buy / 17 sell | 0 buy / 0 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 1.1% | 0.2% |
| Analyst consensus | 59% buy / 41% hold (17) | 100% buy (3) |
| Analyst price target | $161 (+6%) | $76 (+22%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | C (43) | C (36) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 104,000 | 96,092 |
| Founded | 1837 | 1930 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.