Head to head
Unilever vs Procter & Gamble
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: UL · PG
UL
Unilever
60.98+0.30%
1-year price shape — -4% over the period
Quant Rating D · 34/100
vs
PG
Procter & Gamble
147.82-0.40%
1-year price shape — -0% over the period
Quant Rating C · 40/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Procter & Gamble edges it on the scoreable measures. Procter & Gamble has the highest Quant Rating (40); Procter & Gamble has done best over the past year (-0%); Procter & Gamble earns the most per share.
| UL | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | -- |
| Last price | 60.98 | 147.82 |
| Change today | +0.30% | -0.40% |
| 1-year return | -4.3% | -0.2% |
| Market cap | $131.32B | $343.34B |
| 52-week range | 53.97 – 73.09 | 134.62 – 164.77 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 12.85 | 22.33 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 7th | 14th |
| P/B | 7.24 | 6.44 |
| Dividend yield | 3.65% | 2.88% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 4.84 | 6.62 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $10.41B | $15.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44.26B | $87.03B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +12.0% | +1.5% |
| Gross margin | 46.9% | 50.2% |
| Operating margin | 20.2% | 22.7% |
| Net margin | 18.3% | 18.1% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $3.68B | $15.15B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 74.8% | 71.5% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 0 sell | 33 buy / 17 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 0.2% | 1.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (3) | 53% buy / 47% hold (17) |
| Analyst price target | $76 (+25%) | $160 (+8%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (34) | C (40) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 96,092 | 104,000 |
| Founded | 1930 | 1837 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.