Skip to content

NeoGenomics

US · NEO #2660 by market cap Listed 1970
15.97 -0.54 -3.24%
Live - 5344 symbols - heartbeat 122s ago · 2026-10-08 08:27
Pre-market 15.52 -2.82%
After-hours 15.97 0.00%
Overnight 16.02 +0.31%
Market cap
2.05B
P/B
2.61
EPS
-0.84
Reader sentiment Are you bullish or bearish on NEO?

Anonymous reader poll. Unscientific, not investment advice.

Valuation each multiple against its own 5-year range

P/B ratio 2.70 Expensive vs history 91st percentile
5-year average 1.89 · #14 of 40 in Diagnostics & Research
P/E ratio -42.32 Cheap vs history 6th percentile
5-year average -18.46 · forward -48.74
P/S ratio 2.77 In line with history 45th percentile
5-year average 3.18 · forward 2.51 · #15 of 43 in Diagnostics & Research

Vs. peers Diagnostics & Research

Company Market cap P/E (TTM) P/B Div yield
NeoGenomics (NEO) 2.05B -40.95 2.61 0.00%
Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 244.79B 35.63 4.65 0.27%
Danaher (DHR) 153.60B 38.81 2.92 0.66%
Natera (NTRA) 57.02B -293.01 31.30 0.00%
Agilent Technologies (A) 47.67B 33.35 6.47 0.60%
Waters (WAT) 42.84B 110.38 2.82 0.00%

Other StockVane-tracked companies in the same industry.

Morningstar

★★★☆☆ Fair value15.30 Economic moatNone UncertaintyHigh

Trading 4.2% above Morningstar's fair value estimate.

Fair value

NeoGenomics Inc is assigned a 3-star quantitative star rating, illustrating our stance that this share class is a balanced choice, but prudent investors should consider looking elsewhere. The stock currently trades at a 25% premium over our quantitative fair value estimate of $15.30 per share; however, this estimate should be taken with a pinch of salt due to its high uncertainty rating. We require the price/fair value ratio to move a certain amount before the star rating can change. This stability-enhancing buffer is in effect for this stock.

The company's lack of profitability decreases our valuation estimate. Companies with low profitability are often less resilient in recessions and are likely to generate weaker future cash flows for shareholders. For example, the firm's earnings yield of 0.8% sits in the bottom 40% compared with global peers. The earnings generated by the company relative to its share price is concerning, which contributes to our view that shares are expensive.

The company's valuation metrics are an additional cause for concern. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. The firm's enterprise value to EBITDA ratio of 54.5, a core component of valuation, sits in the top 10% compared with global peers. This suggests that the value of its enterprise value, or the value of its shares and debt, is a high multiple of the generated EBITDA. This characteristic further promotes our unfavorable price/fair value ratio.

In addition to the aforementioned drivers, our model considers momentum as part of its comprehensive analysis. This share class has outperformed the broader universe over the past year. This outperformance may signify a bull trap, in light of other detractors from our model.

Economic moat

With its quantitative economic moat rating of none, this business is unlikely to consistently outearn its cost of capital without structural protection from competition. Additionally, the firm's moderate financial health score suggests it is acceptably positioned against adverse economic circumstances.

By Quantitative Equity Report

Quote time 2026-10-08 08:27:54 · For reference only, not investment advice and not tailored to your situation.