Skip to content

Allied Gold

US · AAUC #2568 by market cap Listed 1970
19.58 -0.61 -3.02%
Live - 5344 symbols - heartbeat 19s ago · 2026-10-07 19:54
After-hours 19.68 +0.51%
Market cap
2.73B
P/B
5.42
EPS
-0.45
Reader sentiment Are you bullish or bearish on AAUC?

Anonymous reader poll. Unscientific, not investment advice.

Valuation each multiple against its own 5-year range

P/B ratio 5.59 Cheap vs history 31st percentile
5-year average 7.54 · #44 of 51 in Gold
P/E ratio -38.09 In line with history 51st percentile
5-year average -47.05
P/S ratio 3.15 Expensive vs history 81st percentile
5-year average 2.44 · #13 of 40 in Gold

Vs. peers Gold

Company Market cap P/E (TTM) P/B Div yield
Allied Gold (AAUC) 2.73B -36.94 5.42 0.00%
Newmont (NEM) 119.64B 14.32 3.39 0.90%
Agnico Eagle (AEM) 91.34B 15.44 3.16 0.94%
Barrick Mining (B) 64.49B 10.12 2.36 2.35%
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) 60.72B 29.66 6.27 0.54%
Franco-Nevada (FNV) 45.88B 31.10 5.57 0.69%

Other StockVane-tracked companies in the same industry.

Morningstar

★★☆☆☆ Fair value14.47 Economic moatNone UncertaintyVery High

Trading 26.1% above Morningstar's fair value estimate.

Fair value

Allied Gold Corp receives a 2-star quantitative star rating, reflecting our opinion that this share class is a somewhat unattractive choice, and investors should look elsewhere for more fruitful opportunities. The stock currently trades at a 37% premium over our quantitative fair value estimate of $14.47 per share; however, this estimate should be taken with a pinch of salt due to its very high uncertainty rating.

The company's valuation metrics undermine our estimated fair value. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. Reflecting the firm's valuation is its book value yield of 18.6%, which lies in the bottom 20% compared with peers globally. The market value of this company's shares looks expensive relative to the book (accounting) value of equity, which contributes to our view that shares are expensive.

The company's balance sheet is an additional cause for concern. Low leverage can limit a company's ability to invest in growth, potentially reducing shareholder value compared with a balanced use of debt and equity financing. The firm's debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.1, for example, ranks in the bottom 30% compared with global peers. With little debt relative to assets, this firm has a "lazy" balance sheet, which can depress returns on invested capital. This characteristic further promotes our unfavorable price/fair value ratio.

In addition to the aforementioned drivers, our model considers momentum as part of its comprehensive analysis. This share class has outperformed the broader universe over the past year. This outperformance may signify a bull trap, in light of other detractors from our model.

Economic moat

With its quantitative economic moat rating of none, we do not expect this company to materially outearn its cost of capital in the long run. Additionally, the firm's moderate financial health score suggests it is acceptably positioned against adverse economic circumstances.

By Quantitative Equity Report

Quote time 2026-10-07 19:54:59 · For reference only, not investment advice and not tailored to your situation.