Skip to content

Garmin

US · GRMN #414 by market cap Listed 2000
276.16 -3.05 -1.09%
Live - 5344 symbols - heartbeat 23s ago · 2026-10-08 06:41
Pre-market 274.99 -0.42%
After-hours 276.16 0.00%
Market cap
53.26B
P/B
5.90
EPS
8.59
Reader sentiment Are you bullish or bearish on GRMN?

Anonymous reader poll. Unscientific, not investment advice.

✦ Quant Fair Value how this is computed

Above fair value
167.61 fair value ≈ 201.83 236.05
  • Implied fair-value range of 167.61-236.05, from this stock's own trailing 5-year average P/E applied to trailing EPS.
  • Current price is +36.8% above the average-multiple fair value of 201.83.

Valuation each multiple against its own 5-year range

P/B ratio 6.13 Expensive vs history 98th percentile
5-year average 4.26 · #29 of 32 in Scientific & Technical Instruments
P/E ratio 29.60 Expensive vs history 92nd percentile
5-year average 23.50 · forward 27.53 · #7 of 18 in Scientific & Technical Instruments
P/S ratio 7.21 Expensive vs history 97th percentile
5-year average 5.28 · forward 6.47 · #20 of 32 in Scientific & Technical Instruments

Vs. peers Scientific & Technical Instruments

Company Market cap P/E (TTM) P/B Div yield
Garmin (GRMN) 53.26B 28.50 5.90 1.36%
Coherent (COHR) 65.52B 81.20 6.01 0.00%
Keysight Technologies (KEYS) 64.93B 52.39 9.88 0.00%
Teledyne Technologies (TDY) 28.01B 29.23 2.56 0.00%
MKS Inc (MKSI) 18.47B 43.50 6.18 0.34%
Fortive (FTV) 17.07B 33.44 2.82 0.42%

Other StockVane-tracked companies in the same industry.

Morningstar

★★☆☆☆ Fair value231.00 Economic moatNarrow UncertaintyMedium Capital allocationStandard

Trading 16.4% above Morningstar's fair value estimate.

Analyst note

Garmin reported a healthy second quarter, with revenue up 11% year over year to $2.02 billion. Pro forma EPS was $2.81, representing a solid 29% increase. Encouragingly, a strong performance in the first half of 2026, particularly in the fitness segment, helped raise the full-year outlook.

Why it matters: The headline beat was broad-based, tracking well above our estimates and the FactSet consensus. Fitness remains the key growth engine (sales up 25% year over year), and management's guidance lift suggests it expects wearables momentum to continue for the remainder of the year. The current investor debate is the demand ceiling for these premium wearables in a tough consumer spending environment. We believe Garmin's ability to drive double-digit growth not just in the fitness segment but also in marine implies that demand from its dedicated, enthusiast user base is highly resilient. Impressively, a favorable mix of high-margin products and vertical integration boosted gross margins. However, rising memory prices are expected to pressure margins in the coming quarters. Consequently, we do not expect Garmin to replicate the strong first-half 2026 margin levels.

The bottom line: We raise our fair value estimate for narrow-moat Garmin to $231 from $220 to reflect a healthy second-quarter beat and subsequent guidance raise. With shares trading up 19% on the earnings results, we screen the stock as overvalued at current market levels. We like Garmin's entrenched position with niche communities and its premium pricing. However, at the current forward P/E of 25 times versus our implied 23 times, we believe the market is already incorporating significant credit for segmental growth and continued margin strength. The outdoor segment remains a soft spot, with management saying that sales in the remainder of the year are likely to look more promising. If Fitness continues its trajectory and the outdoor segment bounces back, we could expect to see upside to our estimates.

Management raised full-year revenue guidance to $8.05 billion from $7.9 billion. Pro forma EPS guidance increased more meaningfully to $10.00 from $9.35, roughly a 7% raise, anticipating a stronger operating leverage and earnings outlook than management anticipated at the start of the year.

Fair value

We assign Garmin a fair value estimate of $231 per share, which implies a fiscal 2026 adjusted price/earnings multiple of 23 times, an enterprise value/adjusted EBITDA multiple of 17 times, and a 4% free cash flow yield.

We forecast revenue to compound at 8% annually through 2030. We believe most of Garmin’s growth will be driven by the fitness and outdoor segments, which make up approximately two-thirds of the firm’s revenue. We expect roughly a 10% CAGR for Fitness and a 7% CAGR for Outdoor over the next decade, driven by initial underlying industry growth of high single digits, which slows over time, combined with some share gains.

We project Garmin’s Fitness segment to continue benefiting from demand for advanced wearables like its top-of-the-line running products, as well as planned product launches. We expect Garmin’s Outdoor segment to build on the robust growth of its adventure products by expanding into new markets and improving product functionality to maintain its market leadership. To the extent we reach market saturation faster than expected and the trend of increasing outdoor activity levels peaks, we could see downside to our estimates.

In the aviation segment, we think the company will be able to achieve mid-single-digit revenue growth through continuous product innovation and advanced cockpit technologies supported by strong investment in R&D. If the industry is able to maintain mid-single-digit growth, and Garmin is able to gain some share in new aircraft, such as military installations or even larger aircraft, there could be upside to our estimates.

Garmin’s Marine segment has benefited from strategic acquisitions like JL Audio and Lumishore, helping broaden its product portfolio and helping Garmin grow faster than its peers, despite the slowdown in the boating market. We estimate Garmin’s marine segment will grow at a 5% CAGR through 2035, driven by mild overall industry growth and steady share.

Garmin’s Auto segment growth is driven by expansion into commercial and motorcycle markets, including new partnerships with Yamaha and Honda, plus a major OEM win expected to drive revenue growth in 2027. We project the automotive segment will average a 5% CAGR through 2035, although we expect this revenue stream could be lumpy, depending on design wins.

We forecast GAAP gross margins will stay stable in the high-50% area, and operating margins will improve slightly, from the mid-20% to the high-20% range over time. We believe Garmin's gross margins will improve slightly within its wearables segments, driven by manufacturing scale efficiencies, although this will partially be offset by the higher growth rate for Auto, the lowest gross margin segment. Over the long run, we think the firm can realize modest operating leverage on a larger sales base.

Lastly, we use an 8.9% cost of equity driven by the inherent stability of Garmin’s business, supported by healthy cash flows and a solid competitive moat.

Economic moat

We believe Garmin warrants a narrow moat rating as a result of intangible assets associated with differentiated product functionality and brand reputation across much of the firm’s vast product suite.

We believe Garmin has established a narrow moat in the fitness wearables market, driven by its differentiated hardware and strong brand. We believe Garmin has a highly trusted brand among serious athletes, built on years of consistent and accurate performance data that serious fitness enthusiasts depend on. While competitors like Apple and Samsung create general-purpose smartwatches, Garmin has specialized in serving athletes in specific pursuits, where general-purpose smartwatches would fall short. These athletes generally view Garmin as the gold standard against which other watches are compared.

Ultimately, Garmin’s brand is built on its hardware prowess. Garmin's watches boast technological advantages, including multiband GPS for improved accuracy, exceptionally long battery life that enables 24/7 wear, which feeds continuous data (such as sleep, heart rate variability, and stress) into its proprietary analytics, and some models are even solar-powered. Data-conscious athletes highly value all these features. Furthermore, the company's vertical integration enables tighter quality control, along with faster responses to market shifts with new innovations. While competitors might emulate individual features, duplicating the entire integrated hardware and software service, along with the years of brand reputation, is a tough task.

We believe Garmin’s Outdoor segment functions very similarly to its Fitness segment, as we see Garmin retaining a narrow economic moat, underpinned by intangible assets derived from differentiated hardware and brand intangibles in specialized markets. Here, Garmin’s products are quite broad, including specialized watches for golfers, dog trackers for hunters, tactical watches, satellite communicators, and more.

We think users are drawn to the unique hardware, and Garmin’s differentiation over the years has led to a strong brand, where Garmin is perceived as the industry standard in rugged wearables and handhelds. Users in this segment range from adventure-watch buyers to backpackers and hunters, and often remain loyal due to the integrated ecosystem of adventure hardware.

The segment benefits from niche market leadership where the niches are too small to support many players but are large enough to deliver attractive returns to a market leader like Garmin. While competitor Suunto’s products offer similar capabilities and are priced similarly, we believe that Garmin has earned a stronger market share via better customer brand perception and strong technological execution. We think this perception has led to significant pricing power in its outdoor offerings, reflected in the segment’s strong operating margin.

The company’s R&D intensity and vertical control over design and manufacturing ensure responsiveness and give it control over the entire user experience, helping build on its intangible asset moat. We see Garmin further reinforcing its moat through proprietary mapping assets and exclusive topographic datasets, which provide it with differentiated navigation capabilities not easily replicated by competitors. These features are critical in high-stakes use cases such as mountaineering and ultra-running, where reliability and trust are paramount, and users are price-insensitive.

We believe Garmin’s aviation segment has established a narrow moat through intangible assets. This segment derives most of its revenue from selling integrated flight units, navigation and communication systems, and safety solutions primarily for small- to mid-size planes. This segment competes with offerings from Collins Aerospace and Honeywell. Garmin has considerable intangible assets by having amassed decades of FAA certifications that new entrants must spend years and millions of dollars to match. Additionally, Garmin’s substantial R&D investments and specialized engineering talent have created a vertically integrated manufacturing operation that new entrants would struggle to replicate.

Within Garmin’s marine sector, we believe the company has a narrow moat via intangible assets due to a combination of hardware quality and brand reputation. Garmin’s marine segment caters to both OEMs and end users in the recreational and professional boating markets. They sell chart plotters, sonar systems, autopilots, radar, trolling motors, and even audio equipment. Garmin’s products are generally very popular, competing with offerings from Navico (Brunswick Corp), Furuno, and Raymarine (Teledyne). Garmin has a decades-long track record in marine technology and has built strong brand trust, especially in mission-critical use cases where safety and reliability are critical. Garmin spends a considerable amount on advanced R&D capabilities and technical expertise, thus further widening the gap for new entrants. Furthermore, its high gross margins (55%-plus) are a reflection of premium pricing but also the customer's willingness to pay for quality and reliability.

We think Garmin’s Auto segment lacks a durable moat because it competes in a market with low switching costs and commoditized technology (for both consumers and automotive manufacturers), thus eroding any maintainable competitive edge. Smartphone-based navigation apps like Google Maps have fundamentally disrupted Garmin’s position, with platforms like Apple CarPlay offering comparable or superior experiences at lower costs. Unlike competitors who own their mapping data, Garmin depends on third-party licensing, limiting its ability to create proprietary advantages. Lastly, it is easier for automakers to swap Garmin out for in-house solutions or rival platforms during model refreshes. We foresee Garmin’s future growth hinging on a few key OEM design wins and vulnerable to shifting OEM road maps.

Bull case

Garmin’s brand prowess in advanced wearables, because of its superior topographical charting and superior health tracking, is helping woo performance-focused consumers seeking alternatives to mainstream watches.

New wins in the auto OEM segment should ramp in 2027 and help the business line achieve consistent growth and profitability.

The long-tailed trend of the increasing pursuit of outdoor activities still has years of growth, directly benefiting Garmin.

Bear case

Garmin’s market share in casual and lifestyle wearables is being increasingly encroached by tech giants like Apple, Samsung, and Google, who are increasingly investing in their fitness offerings.

The auto OEM business unit will continue to weigh down on overall profitability given the soft near-term growth outlook and a structurally weaker margin profile, and it will perennially remain an underperforming segment.

The aviation and marine industries are cyclical, while advanced active watch users may already be nearing saturation.

By Eric Compton, CFA, Dhruv Kothari

Quote time 2026-10-08 06:41:03 · For reference only, not investment advice and not tailored to your situation.