NGL Energy
- Market cap
- 1.90B
- P/E (TTM)i
- -5.54
- P/Bi
- 58.13
- EPSi
- -3.19
- Div yieldi
- 0.00%
- 52W posi
- 71%
Anonymous reader poll. Unscientific, not investment advice.
Valuation each multiple against its own 5-year range
Vs. peers Oil & Gas Midstream
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM)i | P/Bi | Div yieldi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGL Energy (NGL) | 1.90B | -5.54 | 58.13 | 0.00% |
| Enbridge (ENB) | 102.28B | 25.16 | 2.49 | 5.87% |
| Williams (WMB) | 87.41B | 28.47 | 6.64 | 2.87% |
| Enterprise Products (EPD) | 79.71B | 12.77 | 2.63 | 5.93% |
| Kinder Morgan (KMI) | 70.86B | 20.53 | 2.24 | 3.69% |
| Energy Transfer (ET) | 70.52B | 14.03 | 2.00 | 6.52% |
Other StockVane-tracked companies in the same industry.
Morningstar
Trading 11.2% above Morningstar's fair value estimate.
Fair value
NGL Energy Partners LP receives a 2-star quantitative star rating, indicating our belief that this share class is a somewhat unattractive choice, and investors should look elsewhere for more fruitful opportunities. The stock currently trades at a 16% premium over our quantitative fair value estimate of $13.52 per share; however, this estimate should be taken with a pinch of salt due to its high uncertainty rating. We require the price/fair value ratio to move a certain amount before the star rating can change. This stability-enhancing buffer is in effect for this stock.
The firm's valuation metrics undermine our estimated fair value. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. Reflecting the firm's valuation is its book value yield of -29.8%, which lies in the bottom 10% globally. The market value of this company's shares looks expensive relative to the book (accounting) value of equity, which contributes to our view that shares are expensive.
The firm's unfavorable dividend structure is an additional cause for concern. Dividends represent a stable form of future cash flows returned to shareholders, and low dividend payments can increase the perceived risk of a business. The firm's forward dividend yield of 0%, for example, sits in the bottom 30% compared with peers globally. This could imply a planned dividend cut or relatively high share price, which further promotes our unfavorable price/fair value ratio.
In addition to the aforementioned drivers, our model considers momentum as part of its comprehensive analysis. This share class has outperformed the broader universe over the past year. This outperformance may signify a bull trap, in light of other detractors from our model.
Economic moat
With its quantitative economic moat rating of none, this business is unlikely to consistently outearn its cost of capital without structural protection from competition. Additionally, the firm's moderate financial health score suggests it is acceptably positioned against adverse economic circumstances.
By Quantitative Equity Report
Quote time 2026-10-07 19:54:59 · For reference only, not investment advice and not tailored to your situation.