SSR Mining
- Market cap
- 6.68B
- P/E (TTM)i
- 29.50
- P/Bi
- 1.97
- EPSi
- 1.85
- Div yieldi
- 0.00%
- 52W posi
- 69%
Anonymous reader poll. Unscientific, not investment advice.
✦ Quant Fair Value how this is computed
- Implied fair-value range of 2.02-45.53, from this stock's own trailing 5-year average P/E applied to trailing EPS.
- Current price is +37.7% above the average-multiple fair value of 23.78.
Valuation each multiple against its own 5-year range
Vs. peers Gold
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM)i | P/Bi | Div yieldi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSR Mining (SSRM) | 6.68B | 29.50 | 1.97 | 0.00% |
| Newmont (NEM) | 119.64B | 14.32 | 3.39 | 0.90% |
| Agnico Eagle (AEM) | 91.34B | 15.44 | 3.16 | 0.94% |
| Barrick Mining (B) | 64.49B | 10.12 | 2.36 | 2.35% |
| Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) | 60.72B | 29.66 | 6.27 | 0.54% |
| Franco-Nevada (FNV) | 45.88B | 31.10 | 5.57 | 0.69% |
Other StockVane-tracked companies in the same industry.
Morningstar
Trading 24.1% above Morningstar's fair value estimate.
Fair value
SSR Mining Inc is assigned a 2-star quantitative star rating, reflecting our opinion that this share class is a somewhat unattractive choice, and investors should look elsewhere for more fruitful opportunities. The stock currently trades at a 36% premium over our quantitative fair value estimate of $24.87 per share; however, this estimate should be taken with a pinch of salt due to its very high uncertainty rating.
The firm's lack of profitability decreases our fair value estimate. Companies with low profitability are often less resilient in recessions and are likely to generate weaker future cash flows for shareholders. For example, the firm's sales yield of 27.0% lies in the bottom 30% compared with global peers. This company's inability to generate significant sales growth without meaningful capital investment is a challenge, which contributes to our view that shares are overvalued.
Alternatively, the company's valuation metrics are reassuring. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. The firm's enterprise value to EBITDA ratio of 5.1, a core component of valuation, lies in the bottom 20% compared with peers globally. Relative to the company's EBITDA, the enterprise value of the business is low, which, despite our unfavorable price/fair value ratio, is a positive attribute.
In addition to the aforementioned drivers, our model considers momentum as part of its comprehensive analysis. This share class has outperformed the broader universe over the past year. This outperformance may signify a bull trap, in light of other detractors from our model.
Economic moat
With its quantitative economic moat rating of none, we do not expect this company to materially outearn its cost of capital in the long run. Additionally, the firm's moderate financial health score suggests it is acceptably positioned against adverse economic circumstances.
By Quantitative Equity Report
Quote time 2026-10-08 07:53:37 · For reference only, not investment advice and not tailored to your situation.