Skip to content

Banc of California

US · BANC #2557 by market cap Listed 1970
17.17 -0.26 -1.49%
Live - 5344 symbols - heartbeat 294s ago · 2026-10-08 07:00
Pre-market 17.16 -0.06%
After-hours 17.10 -0.41%
Market cap
2.72B
P/B
0.93
EPS
1.17
Reader sentiment Are you bullish or bearish on BANC?

Anonymous reader poll. Unscientific, not investment advice.

Valuation each multiple against its own 5-year range

P/B ratio 0.95 In line with history 53rd percentile
5-year average 1.01 · #79 of 354 in Banks - Regional
P/E ratio -40.53 Cheap vs history 4th percentile
5-year average 9.23 · forward 9.14
P/S ratio 3.20 In line with history 53rd percentile
5-year average 3.81 · forward 2.20 · #142 of 354 in Banks - Regional

Vs. peers Banks - Regional

Company Market cap P/E (TTM) P/B Div yield
Banc of California (BANC) 2.72B -39.93 0.93 2.56%
Mizuho Financial (MFG) 131.05B 16.93 1.83 1.62%
HDFC Bank (HDB) 113.60B 15.61 1.35 1.60%
Itau Unibanco (ITUB) 107.35B 11.64 2.47 6.15%
ICICI Bank (IBN) 100.00B 18.03 2.66 0.83%
U.S. Bancorp (USB) 87.52B 11.21 1.44 3.70%

Other StockVane-tracked companies in the same industry.

Morningstar

★★★☆☆ Fair value18.21 Economic moatNone UncertaintyHigh

Trading 6.1% below Morningstar's fair value estimate.

Fair value

Banc of California Inc is assigned a 3-star quantitative star rating, illustrating our stance that this share class is a balanced choice, but prudent investors should consider looking elsewhere. The stock currently trades at a 4% discount to our quantitative fair value estimate of $18.21 per share; however, caution is warranted due to this estimate's high uncertainty rating.

The company's valuation metrics increase our estimated fair value. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. For example, the firm's book value yield of 103.6% ranks in the top 30% compared with global peers. The market price is low relative to the book (accounting) value of the company's equity, which contributes to our view that shares are undervalued.

On a different note, the company's lack of profitability is potentially concerning. Companies with low profitability are often less resilient in recessions and are likely to generate weaker future cash flows for shareholders. The firm's assets turnover ratio of 0.02, for example, ranks in the bottom 10% compared with global peers. Our assessment is that the firm isn't as scalable or productive as it ideally should be, which, despite our favorable price/fair value ratio, is a negative attribute.

In addition to the aforementioned drivers, our model considers momentum as part of its comprehensive analysis. This share class has outperformed the broader universe over the past year. While we believe the stock is undervalued, this outperformance had a negative impact on our valuation estimate.

Economic moat

With its quantitative economic moat rating of none, this business is unlikely to consistently outearn its cost of capital without structural protection from competition. Additionally, the firm's moderate financial health score suggests it is acceptably positioned against adverse economic circumstances.

By Quantitative Equity Report

Quote time 2026-10-08 07:00:04 · For reference only, not investment advice and not tailored to your situation.