Curtiss-Wright
- Market cap
- 18.80B
- P/E (TTM)i
- 35.04
- P/Bi
- 6.79
- EPSi
- 12.87
- Div yieldi
- 0.19%
- 52W posi
- 2%
Anonymous reader poll. Unscientific, not investment advice.
✦ Quant Fair Value how this is computed
- Implied fair-value range of 269.94-550.13, from this stock's own trailing 5-year average P/E applied to trailing EPS.
- Current price is +24.2% above the average-multiple fair value of 410.04.
Valuation each multiple against its own 5-year range
Vs. peers Aerospace & Defense
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM)i | P/Bi | Div yieldi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curtiss-Wright (CW) | 18.80B | 35.04 | 6.79 | 0.19% |
| SpaceX (SPCX) | 2.21T | -248.30 | 17.36 | 0.00% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 315.02B | 36.19 | 17.86 | 0.55% |
| RTX Corp (RTX) | 242.95B | 31.74 | 3.66 | 1.54% |
| Boeing (BA) | 148.84B | 67.74 | 24.43 | 0.00% |
| Lockheed Martin (LMT) | 115.22B | 18.41 | 13.14 | 2.73% |
Other StockVane-tracked companies in the same industry.
Morningstar
Trading 3.0% above Morningstar's fair value estimate.
Fair value
Curtiss-Wright Corp receives a 2-star quantitative star rating, reflecting our opinion that this share class is a somewhat unattractive choice, and investors should look elsewhere for more fruitful opportunities. The stock currently trades at a 10% premium over our quantitative fair value estimate of $494.05 per share; however, this estimate should be taken with a pinch of salt due to its high uncertainty rating.
The firm's valuation metrics undermine our fair value estimate. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. For example, the firm's enterprise value to EBITDA ratio of 23.4 falls in the top 30% compared with peers globally. This suggests that the value of its enterprise value, or the value of its shares and debt, is a high multiple of the generated EBITDA. We believe this is a sign that shares could be expensive.
The firm's lack of profitability is an additional cause for concern. Companies with low profitability are often less resilient in recessions and are likely to generate weaker future cash flows for shareholders. The firm's sales yield of 18.2%, for example, falls in the bottom 20% globally. This company's inability to generate significant sales growth without meaningful capital investment is a challenge, which further promotes our unfavorable price/fair value ratio.
In addition to the aforementioned drivers, our model considers momentum as part of its comprehensive analysis. This share class has outperformed the broader universe over the past year. This outperformance may signify a bull trap, in light of other detractors from our model.
Economic moat
The company earns a quantitative moat rating of wide, suggesting a strong ability to maintain superior profitability thanks to competitive advantages that could persist up to two decades. In addition, the company's moderate financial health score is decent and doesn't seriously concern us with regard to financial distress.
By Quantitative Equity Report
Quote time 2026-10-08 07:40:20 · For reference only, not investment advice and not tailored to your situation.