Skip to content

GoDaddy

US · GDDY #1319 by market cap Listed 2015
97.21 -0.97 -0.99%
Live - 5344 symbols - heartbeat 79s ago · 2026-10-08 02:12
After-hours 96.16 -1.08%
Overnight 97.20 -0.01%
Market cap
12.31B
P/B
1,834.15
EPS
6.22
Reader sentiment Are you bullish or bearish on GDDY?

Anonymous reader poll. Unscientific, not investment advice.

✦ Quant Fair Value how this is computed

Near fair value
95.96 fair value ≈ 187.18 278.41
  • Implied fair-value range of 95.96-278.41, from this stock's own trailing 5-year average P/E applied to trailing EPS.
  • Current price is -48.1% below the average-multiple fair value of 187.18.

Valuation each multiple against its own 5-year range

P/B ratio 1,795.28 Expensive vs history 98th percentile
5-year average 99.82 · #155 of 155 in Software - Infrastructure
P/E ratio 14.14 Cheap vs history 22nd percentile
5-year average 30.09 · forward 11.53 · #25 of 83 in Software - Infrastructure
P/S ratio 2.36 Cheap vs history 7th percentile
5-year average 3.65 · forward 2.24 · #65 of 174 in Software - Infrastructure

Vs. peers Software - Infrastructure

Company Market cap P/E (TTM) P/B Div yield
GoDaddy (GDDY) 12.31B 14.44 1,834.15 0.00%
Microsoft (MSFT) 3.93T 29.51 8.89 0.67%
Palantir (PLTR) 466.48B 165.91 47.73 0.00%
Oracle (ORCL) 434.09B 22.50 7.02 1.39%
Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 331.76B 1,013.93 12.07 0.00%
CrowdStrike (CRWD) 271.79B 6,985.26 53.28 0.00%

Other StockVane-tracked companies in the same industry.

Morningstar

★★★☆☆ Fair value115.00 Economic moatNone UncertaintyVery High Capital allocationStandard

Trading 18.3% below Morningstar's fair value estimate.

Analyst note

On Sept. 24, the Financial Times reported that Gen Digital, a cybersecurity company, is in early discussions to acquire domain registrar GoDaddy. Following the report, GoDaddy's shares surged 11% but partly pulled back, while Gen Digital's fell as much as 12% over the day.

Why it matters: While deal terms have not yet been disclosed, the strategic rationale is likely that combining GoDaddy and Gen Digital's scale and product depth could better position the combined entity to weather artificial intelligence disruption risk, a key market concern. GoDaddy is a leading domain registrar with more than 20 million customers, primarily small and medium-sized businesses. The firm retails web domain registrations, along with online presence-building and e-commerce solutions. GoDaddy's SMB base can serve as a new avenue for growth for the consumer-focused Gen Digital, while GoDaddy could bundle Gen's identity protection tools with its own offerings. Our initial read on the deal is skeptical, given the limited overlap between the two firms' solution suites.

The bottom line: We maintain our fair value estimates for no-moat Gen Digital and GoDaddy at $25 and $115 per share, respectively, as takeover talks remain in the early stages and offer details remain undisclosed. We believe a takeover could be dilutive for Gen's shareholders, as the firm will likely have to issue stock to fund a deal that would be roughly 12 times its 2025 MoneyLion acquisition. The firm may also have to take on new debt, which is risky given the firm's already high debt and low liquidity.

Bears say: GoDaddy and Gen Digital are two completely different companies, and synergies between their solution suites will likely be hard to extract. Moreover, the takeover-enabled scale does not resolve the AI-disintermediation risks that remain an overhang on the companies' long-term prospects.

Fair value

Our fair value estimate for GoDaddy is $115 per share, implying a fiscal 2026 adjusted price/earnings ratio of 16 times and enterprise value/sales ratio of 3 times. We model a five-year compound annual revenue growth rate of approximately 5%, driven by low-single-digit growth in the core platform segment and low-teens to high-single-digit growth in the applications and commerce segment.

Within the core platform segment, we expect promotional pricing to drive decelerating segment revenue growth over our explicit forecast period, with the potential to turn negative should competition continue to intensify. Overall, we expect the firm to gradually lose market share in this space, as new entrants in the domain registration market and lower technical barriers to switching registrars could drive churn. This may be partially offset by elevated aftermarket revenue in certain periods, though the timing remains uncertain.

Within the application and commerce segment, we expect growth to be driven by upsell and cross-sell of add-ons like web-hosting and commerce solutions to domain registrants within the existing customer base. With nearly half of its customers using two or less products, we believe GoDaddy has solid runway to increase its wallet share. Within commerce, we view GoDaddy Payments, a payment facilitation solution, as a growing and sticky offering. However, payment facilitators tend to carry lower margins than other solutions and may pressure GoDaddy's margins as the business scales, though bundling with higher-margin solutions could help offset this impact.

On Airo, we continue to monitor the solution's adoption and its impact on the firm's financials. Early signs indicate the solution has the potential to be a key retention and upsell driver, though as of mid-2026, it makes up an immaterial portion of GoDaddy's revenue. We also continue to monitor its impact on GoDaddy's margins, as vibe coding tools often imply higher compute costs, which can pressure margins, though we have yet to see this reflected in results, given the solution's small scale.

In terms of margins, we expect a mix shift toward the higher-margin applications and commerce segment to support normalized EBITDA (NEBITDA) margin expansion from 32% in 2025 to 35% by 2030. As a registrar, GoDaddy has limited pricing flexibility when registry operators such as Verisign raise their prices. Management commentary suggests that targeted pricing and bundling initiatives can help offset this pressure, though rising competition and AI-related costs may add further strain.

Economic moat

We assign GoDaddy a no-moat Morningstar Economic Moat Rating. In our view, the commoditized nature of domains drives registrars to compete aggressively on largely comparable add-on services and pricing in the battle for customer acquisition. We also expect AI to further intensify this competition by lowering technical barriers for new entrants and lowering switching costs for customers, creating significant uncertainty around GoDaddy's ability to earn returns above its cost of capital over the next decade.

GoDaddy competes in the domain registrar, registry operations, e-commerce, and website-building markets. The firm is the undisputed global leader in domain registration, though it faces increasing competition from other registrars such as Namecheap and Porkbun for new registrations. It also competes with content management systems like Wix and WordPress, e-commerce and merchant solution platforms like Shopify, Block, and Squarespace, and a host of paid and free do-it-yourself website- and online-store-building tools. More than half of the firm's revenue comes from its core platform segment, which includes domain and hosting revenue. The second segment, applications and commerce, benefits from attractive software-as-a-service economics and serves as the primary driver of retention and margin.

Domain registrars purchase domains from registry operators such as Verisign and sell them to individuals and businesses with a markup. While registry operators hold structural monopolies on their domains' wholesale pricing, registrars like GoDaddy are price takers, and the same domain, if available, can be purchased from any registrar, making retail pricing intensely competitive. GoDaddy's strategy is to win customers at a cheap domain registration price for the first year and then reap high prices at renewal. However, the firm's declining market share in domain registration (from 24% in 2022 to 21% in 2025) is evidence of weak pricing power and growing competition. Competitors such as Namecheap, Porkbun, and Squarespace run similar playbooks, often with lower markups. GoDaddy's pivot toward high-intent, high-attach customers has not stopped this erosion at the top of the funnel, and its recent shift to more aggressive promotional pricing suggests it is having to match competitors' thinner renewal markups just to hold on to its existing base. Without genuine product differentiation or sufficient platform stickiness, GoDaddy may need to lean further into price competition to protect the customer base it depends on for both upselling and new customer acquisition.

Although GoDaddy's applications and commerce segment presents some moaty characteristics, we lack sufficient confidence in their durability. Given the commoditized nature of domains, registrars invest aggressively in add-ons to attract and lock in customers. While switching costs can aggregate across multiple products, we estimate that, as of 2025, more than half of GoDaddy's customer base purchases only one or two products, one of which is often just the domain itself, implying low stickiness. Moreover, the average GoDaddy customer is a do-it-yourself small business owner with a nontechnical background who is simply looking to establish an online presence as quickly and easily as possible. Among customers of Websites + Marketing, a popular solution suite, many have basic website buildouts with few add-ons or technical integrations, making them easy to rebuild from scratch. Many websites are also built on open-source WordPress through the firm's Managed WordPress offering, making migration to alternative WordPress platforms relatively straightforward. Other add-ons, such as online store builders, marketing tools, and productivity solutions, are also becoming increasingly commoditized. We view these application-layer offerings as highly exposed to AI-related disruptions. While large language model (LLM)-enabled website and online store building is not yet as turnkey as GoDaddy's intuitive interface for nontechnical users, we expect AI-enabled product development to meaningfully increase competition and further pressure GoDaddy's market share.

GoDaddy also benefits from a certain degree of customer inertia, though we lack confidence in the durability of this switching cost over a 10-year horizon. Nontechnical customers often perceive switching registrars as risky or difficult, causing them to remain in renewals at elevated prices. However, in practice, switching registrars takes little time and requires no technical expertise, since most registrars offer domain-transfer tools. AI stands to weaken this inertia-based retention further by lowering the expertise barrier for nontechnical customers and by automating and simplifying the website-building process for those with simpler buildouts. While the firm’s average customer retention of 85% is not unusual for companies with high small business exposure, combined with the low product attach, commodity-like nature of key solutions, and growing competition, we lack sufficient confidence to grant the firm a moat rating.

In response to growing AI demand, GoDaddy has launched Airo, a paid AI-enabled offering built on decades of proprietary data that bundles hosting, ideation, domain and email setup, and online selling into a single product. Airo is still in its early days but has shown encouraging signs of becoming a key retention and upsell driver. In addition to the risk of intensifying competition driven by AI-enabled product development, the firm's business also faces broader uncertainty around the impact of AI agents on identity- and trust-driven discovery and browsing. We believe a shift to an agentic open web will likely change the definition of "online presence" for website owners and their visitors, implying risks to GoDaddy's long-term growth.

Bull case

GoDaddy’s AI-powered solution, Airo, is well positioned to be a comprehensive platform offering for micro and small businesses looking to establish an online presence and can help GoDaddy stand out in its core domain registrar market.

Commerce solutions like GoDaddy Payments are attractive solutions to GoDaddy’s targeted small business owners base and can help improve customer retention and monetization.

Digitization and developing internet infrastructure in international markets should support new domain registrations for well-known registrars like GoDaddy.

Bear case

AI-enabled coding and product development present significant risks to firms with high application-layer exposure like GoDaddy, both by raising competition and by lowering technical switching costs.

Intensifying competition at the domain registration layer may pressure GoDaddy’s customer acquisition funnel and cap future growth.

Domain resellers like Shopify, which buy domains from wholesale registrars, are well positioned to capture the lucrative upselling and bundling economics while sidestepping the price competition that GoDaddy faces in the core domain registration market.

By Jivyaa Vaidya

Quote time 2026-10-08 02:12:20 · For reference only, not investment advice and not tailored to your situation.