Rogers
- Market cap
- 2.75B
- P/E (TTM)i
- 91.10
- P/Bi
- 2.28
- EPSi
- -3.40
- Div yieldi
- 0.00%
- 52W posi
- 84%
Anonymous reader poll. Unscientific, not investment advice.
Valuation each multiple against its own 5-year range
Vs. peers Electronic Components
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM)i | P/Bi | Div yieldi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rogers (ROG) | 2.75B | 91.10 | 2.28 | 0.00% |
| Amphenol (APH) | 215.90B | 43.78 | 13.94 | 0.52% |
| Corning (GLW) | 140.62B | 75.23 | 11.20 | 0.69% |
| TE Connectivity (TEL) | 62.49B | 21.14 | 4.72 | 1.35% |
| Celestica (CLS) | 46.32B | 38.62 | 18.68 | 0.00% |
| Flex Ltd (FLEX) | 44.09B | 46.08 | 8.02 | 0.00% |
Other StockVane-tracked companies in the same industry.
Morningstar
Trading 3.3% above Morningstar's fair value estimate.
Fair value
Rogers Corp receives a 3-star quantitative star rating, indicating our belief that this share class is a balanced choice, but prudent investors should consider looking elsewhere. The stock currently trades at a 7% premium over our quantitative fair value estimate of $148.83 per share; however, this estimate should be taken with a pinch of salt due to its medium uncertainty rating.
The firm's lack of profitability decreases our estimated fair value. Companies with low profitability are often less resilient in recessions and are likely to generate weaker future cash flows for shareholders. For example, the firm's earnings yield of 2.0% ranks in the bottom 40% compared with peers globally. The earnings generated by the company relative to its share price is concerning, which contributes to our view that shares are expensive.
The company's valuation metrics are an additional cause for concern. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. The firm's enterprise value to market value ratio of 0.9, for example, falls in the bottom 40% compared with peers globally. The market value of equity makes up a large fraction of enterprise value, indicating that shares have sharply risen, or that the company has a "lazy" balance sheet that is underleveraged. This characteristic further promotes our unfavorable price/fair value ratio.
In addition to the aforementioned drivers, our model considers momentum as part of its comprehensive analysis. This share class has outperformed the broader universe over the past year. This outperformance may signify a bull trap, in light of other detractors from our model.
Economic moat
This company lacks a competitive advantage, receiving a quantitative economic moat rating of none. Additionally, the firm's moderate financial health score suggests it is acceptably positioned against adverse economic circumstances.
By Quantitative Equity Report
Quote time 2026-10-08 06:20:07 · For reference only, not investment advice and not tailored to your situation.