Safety Insurance
- Market cap
- 1.53B
- P/E (TTM)i
- 22.34
- P/Bi
- 1.74
- EPSi
- 6.70
- Div yieldi
- 3.54%
- 52W posi
- 100%
Anonymous reader poll. Unscientific, not investment advice.
✦ Quant Fair Value how this is computed
- Implied fair-value range of 62.25-223.93, from this stock's own trailing 5-year average P/E applied to trailing EPS.
- Current price is -27.4% below the average-multiple fair value of 143.09.
Valuation each multiple against its own 5-year range
Vs. peers Insurance - Property & Casualty
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM)i | P/Bi | Div yieldi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Insurance (SAFT) | 1.53B | 22.34 | 1.74 | 3.54% |
| Chubb Ltd (CB) | 129.13B | 11.86 | 1.71 | 1.17% |
| Progressive (PGR) | 124.28B | 10.74 | 3.62 | 6.49% |
| The Travelers Companies (TRV) | 75.21B | 9.69 | 2.27 | 1.26% |
| Allstate (ALL) | 56.63B | 4.48 | 1.79 | 1.86% |
| WR Berkley (WRB) | 25.89B | 14.35 | 2.63 | 0.53% |
Other StockVane-tracked companies in the same industry.
Morningstar
Trading 4.8% above Morningstar's fair value estimate.
Fair value
Safety Insurance Group Inc receives a 3-star quantitative star rating, reflecting our opinion that this share class is a balanced choice, but prudent investors should consider looking elsewhere. The stock currently trades at a 5% premium over our quantitative fair value estimate of $98.87 per share; however, this estimate should be taken with a pinch of salt due to its medium uncertainty rating.
The company's valuation metrics undermine our fair value estimate. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. Reflecting the firm's valuation is its enterprise value to market value ratio of 1.0, which ranks in the bottom 45% globally. The market value of equity makes up a large fraction of enterprise value, indicating that shares have sharply risen, or that the company has a "lazy" balance sheet that is underleveraged. We believe this is a sign that shares could be overvalued.
The firm's balance sheet is an additional cause for concern. Low leverage can limit a company's ability to invest in growth, potentially reducing shareholder value compared with a balanced use of debt and equity financing. The firm's debt to EBITDA ratio of 0.6, for example, lies in the bottom 20% globally. With little debt relative to assets, this firm has a "lazy" balance sheet, which can depress returns on invested capital. This characteristic further promotes our unfavorable price/fair value ratio.
In addition to the aforementioned drivers, our model considers momentum as part of its comprehensive analysis. This share class has outperformed the broader universe over the past year. This outperformance may signify a bull trap, in light of other detractors from our model.
Economic moat
With its quantitative economic moat rating of none, this business is unlikely to consistently outearn its cost of capital without structural protection from competition. Additionally, the firm's moderate financial health score suggests it is acceptably positioned against adverse economic circumstances.
By Quantitative Equity Report
Quote time 2026-10-07 19:54:59 · For reference only, not investment advice and not tailored to your situation.